Abstract
This chapter uses the concept of anticipation to reposition a philosophical tension regarding the way in which educational responsibility is usually understood. The tension puts educational practice in conflict with itself, to the extent that many of its practices are self-undermining and incoherent. In addressing this philosophical tension, I first explain its basis. Following this, I argue that the tension is produced by an extrapolatory form of anticipation and futurity that is so dominant in contemporary Western society as to be considered “unavoidable” and “natural.” Finally, I present a symbiotic conception of anticipation and futurity that can reveal the uniqueness and coherence of education’s allegedly “conflicted” responsibilities and which produces an understanding of education as an event that has value “in itself.” That is, education does not serve some other higher (political or moral) purpose but has its own intrinsic value. My primary argument is that this synthesis points to the crucial importance of philosophical work that presents education in a mode outside of taken for granted, extrapolatory forms of anticipatory logic.
References
Abensour, M., (2008). Persistent Utopia. Constellations 15(3):406–421.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2005). What’s left? Just the future. Antipode, 37(2), 226–238.
Andreotti, V., & de Souza, L.-M. (2008). Translating theory into practice and walking minefields: Lessons from the project ‘Through Other Eyes’. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 1(1), 23–36.
Apple, M. (1995). Education and power. London: Routledge.
Arendt, H. (1961). The crisis in education. Chap 5. In Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought (pp. 173–197). New York: Viking Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham: Duke University Press.
Battiste, M. (2004). Bringing aboriginal education into the contemporary education: Narratives of cognitive imperialism reconciling with decolonization. In J. Collard & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Leadership, gender and culture. Male and female perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Bernstein, R. (1991). Incommensurability and otherness revisited. In E. Deutsch (Ed.), Culture and modernity: East-West philosophic perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Biesta, G. (2013). Responsive or responsible? Democratic education for the global networked society. Policy Futures in Education, 11(6), 733–744.
Biesta, G. (2016). The rediscovery of teaching: On robot vacuum cleaners, non-egological education and the limits of the hermeneutical world view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(4), 374–392.
Bourassa, G.N. & Margonis, F. (2017) Monstrous Generosity: Pedagogical Affirmations of the “Improper”. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(6), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9566-3.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–19.
Burbules. (2004). Ways of thinking about educational quality. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 4–10.
Chalmers, D. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In P. Davies & P. Clayton (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 244–256). Abingdon: Oxford University Press.
Chave, S. (2017). Education, sustainability and intersubjectivity: Exploring the possibility of the emergence of new ways of knowing, being and acting in the world. PhD thesis submitted to the University of Exeter.
Connolly, W. E. (2013). The ‘new materialism’ and the fragility of things. Millenium: Journal of International Studies., 41(3), 399–412.
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms. Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism (trans: Tomlinson, H. & Habberjam, B.). New York: Zone books.
Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life (trans: Boyman, A.). New York: Zone Books.
Derrida, J. (1992). The other heading. Reflections on today’s Europe. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Dewey, J. (2004). Democracy and education. New York: Dover Publications.
Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Evans, R. J. (2002). From historicism to postmodernism: Historiography in the twentieth century. History and Theory, 41(1), 79–87.
Giroux, H. (2009). Youth in a suspect society: Democracy or disposability? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gordon, M. (Ed.). (2001). Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world. Boulder: Westview Press.
Gur-Ze’ev, I. (Ed.). (2010). The possibility/impossibility of a new critical language in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hickey-Moody, A., Palmer, H., & Sayers, E. (2016). Diffractive pedagogies: Dancing across new materialist imaginaries. Gender and Education, 28(2), 213–229.
Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2017). Education and the love for the world. Articulating a post-critical educational philosophy. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, 31 March–2 April, 2017.
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kurokawa, K. (1994). The philosophy of symbiosis. New York: Wiley.
Land, G., & Jarman, B. (1992). Break point and beyond. Mastering the future. New York: Harper-Collins Publishers.
Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and infinity. Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Pittsburgh: Duquesane University Press.
Levinas, E. (1994). Outside the subject. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levinas, E. (2006). Humanism of the other. Urbana: Illinois University Press.
Lewis, T., & Khan, R. (2010). Education out of bounds: Reimagining cultural studies for a posthuman age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. London: Open Court Publishing Company.
Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Margonis, F. (1992). New problems in child-centered pedagogy. Yearbook. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, University of Illinois. https://web.archive.org/web/20060830201446/http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/eps/PES-Yearbook/92_docs/MARGONIS.HTM (Accessed 5 Oct 2017)
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.
Osberg, D. (2015). Learning, complexity and emergent (irreversible) change. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning (pp. 23–40). London: Sage.
Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of ‘strong’ emergence. Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.
Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2008). The emergent curriculum. Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 313–328.
Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2010). The end/s of education: Complexity and the conundrum of the inclusive educational curriculum. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(6), 593–607.
Prigogine, I. (1984). The rediscovery of time. Zygon, 19(4), 433–447.
Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty. Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. New York: The Free Press.
Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus. Politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Shklar, J. N. (1985). Nineteen eighty four. Should political theory care? Political Theory, 13(1), 5–18.
Sidorkin, A. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools and dialogue with evil. New York: Peter Lang.
Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. New York: Routledge.
Spribille, T., Tuovinen, V., Resl, P., Vanderpool, D., Wolinski, H., Aime, C., Schneider, K., Stabentheiner, E., Toome-Heller, M., Thor, G., Mayrhofer, H., Johannesson, H., & McCutcheon, J. (2016). Basidiomycete yeasts in the cortex of ascomycete macrolichens. Science, 353(6298), 488–492.
St Pierre, E., Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms. Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.
Steiner, R. (2003). Soul economy. Body, soul and spirit in Waldorf Education. Lectures presented in Dornach, 23 Dec 1921–5 Jan 1922. Anthroposophic Press (www.steinerbooks.org).
Taylor, C., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Todd, S. (2003). Learning from the other. Albany: Suny Press.
Topolski, A. (2008). Creating citizens in the classroom: Hannah Arendt’s political critique of education. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 15(2), 259–282.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the policies of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Osberg, D. (2018). Education and the Future. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_88-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_88-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities