Skip to main content

Education and the Future

Rethinking the Role of Anticipation and Responsibility in Multicultural and Technological Societies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Anticipation

Abstract

This chapter uses the concept of anticipation to reposition a philosophical tension regarding the way in which educational responsibility is usually understood. The tension puts educational practice in conflict with itself, to the extent that many of its practices are self-undermining and incoherent. In addressing this philosophical tension, I first explain its basis. Following this, I argue that the tension is produced by an extrapolatory form of anticipation and futurity that is so dominant in contemporary Western society as to be considered “unavoidable” and “natural.” Finally, I present a symbiotic conception of anticipation and futurity that can reveal the uniqueness and coherence of education’s allegedly “conflicted” responsibilities and which produces an understanding of education as an event that has value “in itself.” That is, education does not serve some other higher (political or moral) purpose but has its own intrinsic value. My primary argument is that this synthesis points to the crucial importance of philosophical work that presents education in a mode outside of taken for granted, extrapolatory forms of anticipatory logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abensour, M., (2008). Persistent Utopia. Constellations 15(3):406–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2005). What’s left? Just the future. Antipode, 37(2), 226–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreotti, V., & de Souza, L.-M. (2008). Translating theory into practice and walking minefields: Lessons from the project ‘Through Other Eyes’. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 1(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1995). Education and power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1961). The crisis in education. Chap 5. In Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought (pp. 173–197). New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Battiste, M. (2004). Bringing aboriginal education into the contemporary education: Narratives of cognitive imperialism reconciling with decolonization. In J. Collard & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Leadership, gender and culture. Male and female perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. (1991). Incommensurability and otherness revisited. In E. Deutsch (Ed.), Culture and modernity: East-West philosophic perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2013). Responsive or responsible? Democratic education for the global networked society. Policy Futures in Education, 11(6), 733–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2016). The rediscovery of teaching: On robot vacuum cleaners, non-egological education and the limits of the hermeneutical world view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(4), 374–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, G.N. & Margonis, F. (2017) Monstrous Generosity: Pedagogical Affirmations of the “Improper”. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(6), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9566-3.

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burbules. (2004). Ways of thinking about educational quality. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 4–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In P. Davies & P. Clayton (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 244–256). Abingdon: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chave, S. (2017). Education, sustainability and intersubjectivity: Exploring the possibility of the emergence of new ways of knowing, being and acting in the world. PhD thesis submitted to the University of Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. E. (2013). The ‘new materialism’ and the fragility of things. Millenium: Journal of International Studies., 41(3), 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms. Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism (trans: Tomlinson, H. & Habberjam, B.). New York: Zone books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life (trans: Boyman, A.). New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). The other heading. Reflections on today’s Europe. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2004). Democracy and education. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. J. (2002). From historicism to postmodernism: Historiography in the twentieth century. History and Theory, 41(1), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2009). Youth in a suspect society: Democracy or disposability? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. (Ed.). (2001). Hannah Arendt and education: Renewing our common world. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gur-Ze’ev, I. (Ed.). (2010). The possibility/impossibility of a new critical language in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A., Palmer, H., & Sayers, E. (2016). Diffractive pedagogies: Dancing across new materialist imaginaries. Gender and Education, 28(2), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2017). Education and the love for the world. Articulating a post-critical educational philosophy. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, 31 March–2 April, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurokawa, K. (1994). The philosophy of symbiosis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, G., & Jarman, B. (1992). Break point and beyond. Mastering the future. New York: Harper-Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and infinity. Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Pittsburgh: Duquesane University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1994). Outside the subject. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (2006). Humanism of the other. Urbana: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T., & Khan, R. (2010). Education out of bounds: Reimagining cultural studies for a posthuman age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. London: Open Court Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margonis, F. (1992). New problems in child-centered pedagogy. Yearbook. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, University of Illinois. https://web.archive.org/web/20060830201446/http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/eps/PES-Yearbook/92_docs/MARGONIS.HTM (Accessed 5 Oct 2017)

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D. (2015). Learning, complexity and emergent (irreversible) change. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning (pp. 23–40). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of ‘strong’ emergence. Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2008). The emergent curriculum. Navigating a complex course between unguided learning and planned enculturation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2010). The end/s of education: Complexity and the conundrum of the inclusive educational curriculum. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(6), 593–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1984). The rediscovery of time. Zygon, 19(4), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty. Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus. Politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. N. (1985). Nineteen eighty four. Should political theory care? Political Theory, 13(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorkin, A. (2002). Learning relations: Impure education, deschooled schools and dialogue with evil. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spribille, T., Tuovinen, V., Resl, P., Vanderpool, D., Wolinski, H., Aime, C., Schneider, K., Stabentheiner, E., Toome-Heller, M., Thor, G., Mayrhofer, H., Johannesson, H., & McCutcheon, J. (2016). Basidiomycete yeasts in the cortex of ascomycete macrolichens. Science, 353(6298), 488–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St Pierre, E., Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms. Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R. (2003). Soul economy. Body, soul and spirit in Waldorf Education. Lectures presented in Dornach, 23 Dec 1921–5 Jan 1922. Anthroposophic Press (www.steinerbooks.org).

  • Taylor, C., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. (2003). Learning from the other. Albany: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topolski, A. (2008). Creating citizens in the classroom: Hannah Arendt’s political critique of education. Ethical Perspectives: Journal of the European Ethics Network, 15(2), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the policies of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Osberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Osberg, D. (2018). Education and the Future. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_88-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_88-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics