Skip to main content

Anticipation in Asymmetric Warfare

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Anticipation
  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter seeks to articulate a theory of anticipation for asymmetric conflicts. Drawing on insights associated with complexity theory as well as social science critique, it argues that asymmetric conflicts are complex in ways that symmetric conflicts are not and this increase in complexity makes prediction practically impossible. However, an understanding of how the relevant communal narratives of the factions in conflict make sense of this complexity can allow one to anticipate how a conflict will unfold and how it will end. Anticipating the course of such conflicts requires understanding how the different ends impact the character of war one is fighting and how that character impacts the relationship between military means and political ends. What fills the gap between what the military can do and the political objective it is trying to achieve is the communal narrative, which articulates collective identity and in so doing identifies the kinds of things that threaten it and thus what a population will likely fight for regardless of cost. Understanding how these narratives “fit” together allows one to organize the relevant military, political, social, and cultural information in ways that make the current state of the conflict intelligible, which is necessary to anticipating its future course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addington, L. H. (1990). The patterns of war since the eighteenth century. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • al-Taie, A. (2005). Fallujah saved by ‘Divine Intervention’. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://iwpr.net/global-voices/fallujah-saved-divine-intervention

  • Arreguin-Toft, I. (2001). How the weak win wars. International Security, 26(1), 93–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, S. (2004). Modern war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. R., Ries, C. P., Hanauer, L., Connable, B., Kelly, T. K., McNerney, M. J., Young, S., Campbell, J., & McMahon, K. S. (2013). Ending the US war in Iraq: The final transition, operational maneuver, and disestablishment of United States Forces-Iraq. Washington, DC: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzdzinski, J. E. (2004). Demystifying Shashoujian: China’s Assassin’s Mace Concept. In A. Scobell & L. Wortzel (Eds.), Civil military change in China: Elites, institutes, and ideas after the 16th Party Congress (pp. 309–364). Carlisle: Stratregic Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callwell, C. E. (1914). Small wars: Their principles and practice. London: Harrison and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doughty, R. A. (1990). The breaking point: Sedan and the fall of France, 1940. Hamden: Archon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugard, M. (2010). Farmers at arms: The first modern insurgency and how the British crushed it.Military History, 27(1), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, T. N. (1979). Numbers, predictions, and war: Using history to evaluate combat factors and predict the outcome of battles. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M. T., Pottinger, M., & Batchelor, P. (2010). Fixing Intel: A blueprint for making intelligence relevant in Afghanistan. In Voices from the field. Washington, DC: Center for New American Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemen, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. S. (2010). War – Continuity in change, and change in continuity. Parameters, 40, 5–15. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2010summer/gray.pdf

  • Griffiths, W. R. (1986). The great war. In T. Greiss (Ed.), The West point military history series. Wayne: Avery Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashim, A. (2006). Insurgency and counter-insurgency in Iraq. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, A. (2006). A savage war of peace: Algeria, 1954–1962. New York: New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iraq Body Count. (2016). Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

  • Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the wake of chaos: Unpredictable order in dynamical systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krepinevich, A. F. (2009). The Pentagon’s wasting assets. Foreign Affairs,88(4). Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2009-07-01/pentagons-wasting-assets

  • Liang, Q., & Xiansui, W. (1999). Unrestricted warfare. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from http://www.cryptome.org/cuw.htm

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., & West, F. J. (2012). Into the fire: A first-hand account of the most extraordinary battle in the Afghan War. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton-Edwards, B. (2005). Islamic fundamentalism since 1945. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashal, M. (2016). Civilian casualties in Afghan War are unabated in 2016. The New York Times. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from www.nytimes.com/2016/04/18/world/middleeast/civilian-casualties

  • Office of the White House Press Secretary. (2001). President Bush Delivers Graduation Speech at West Point. West Point. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/06/20020601-3.html

  • Poli, R. (2016). Belief systems and the modeling relationship. Foundations of Science, 21(1), 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2017). Introducing anticipation. The handbook of anticipation. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Record, J. (2007). Beating goliath: Why insurgencies win. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D. (1991) Chance and Chaos. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, R. H., & Dew, A. J. (2006). Insurgents, terrorists, and militias: The warriors of contemporary combat. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. (2013). War from the ground up: Twenty-first century combat as politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2007). The utility of force: The art of war in the modern world. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. (2013). The failed reconstruction of Iraq. The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/03/the-failed-reconstruction-of-iraq/274041/

  • Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. (2016). Quarterly Report to the United States Congress 30 July 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Government. Retrieved September 26, 2016, from https://www.sigar.mil/pdf/quarterlyreports/2016-07-30qr.pdf

  • Sullivan, P. L. (2007). War aims and outcomes: Why powerful states lose limited wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(5), 496–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toomey, C. L. (2004). XVIII Airborne Corps in Desert Storm: From planning to victory. Central Point: Hellgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Marine Corps. (1940). Small wars manual. Manhattan: Sunflower University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlahos, M. (2009). Fighting Identity: Sacred War and World Change. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, B. (2011). The Afghan Mission Behind Today’s Medal of Honor – Inside a village on the Pakistan Border, America’s defining values were on display. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 25, 2016, from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904353504576566302974342330.html

  • Zelikow, P., et al. (2004). The 9/11 Commission Report. Retrieved September 27, 2016, from https://9-11commission.gov/report/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Anthony Pfaff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pfaff, C.A. (2017). Anticipation in Asymmetric Warfare. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_75-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_75-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics