Skip to main content

Selling the Future: Knowledge Brokers and their Responsibility

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Anticipation
  • 356 Accesses

Abstract

In an age of uncertainty, those who can anticipate revolution, the outbreak of wars, or which states might default are much in demand. The marketplace of ideas about the future is huge, and includes ‘wonks’, scholars and pundits who produce scenarios, predictions and ratings. The more opaque the future seems to be, the further the relationship between knowledge and power intensifies – above all the nexus between those who sell their expertise and those who consume it. This chapter discusses issues of responsibility that arise when experts make future claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amalrik, A. (1970). Will the Soviet Union survive until 1984? New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (trans: Ritter, M.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1986). The American invasion of Grenada: A note on false prophecy. The Yale Review, 75(4), 564–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (2008). The American invasion of Grenada: A note on false prophecy. Foresight: The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 10(3), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (2013). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, G. (2006). Prediction or prophecy? The boundaries of economic foreknowledge and their socio-political consequences. Wiesbaden: Deutsche Universitäts-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialer, S. (1986). The Soviet paradox: External expansion, internal decline. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Z. (1969). Dilemmas of change in Soviet politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIA, Directorate of Intelligence. (1983, June). The slowdown in Soviet industry, 1976–1982. A Research Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1995). Prediction in macrosociology: The case of the Soviet collapse. American Journal of Sociology, 100(6), 1552–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colonomos, A. (2013). The gamble of war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colonomos, A. (2016). Selling the future – The perils of predicting global politics. London/New York: Hurst and Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • d’Encausse, H. C. (1979). Decline of an empire: The Soviet socialist republics in revolt. New York: Newsweek Books. (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey, N. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica: Rand/US Air Force Rand Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dator, J. (2008). Futures, volume one and two: Then and now. Futures, 40(10), 903–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (Eds.). (2012). Governance by indicators: Global power through quantification and rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. (1954). Cracks in the monolith: Possibilities and patterns of disintegration in totalitarian systems. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), Totalitarianism (pp. 308–333).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, D. (2009). Know your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America’s Soviet Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleron, F. J. (Ed.). (1969). Communist studies and the social sciences: Essays on methodology and empirical theory. Washington, DC: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C. J. (Ed.). (1954). Totalitarianism: Proceedings of a conference held at the American academy of arts and sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C. J., & Brzezinski, Z. (Eds.). (1966). Totalitarianism, dictatorship and autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the future: Modernization theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organisation, 46(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere (trans: Burger, T.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1996). Between facts and norms (trans: Rehg, W.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). Inclusion of the other. Cambridge: Polity Press. (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (2001). The postnational constellation (trans: Pensky, M.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, O., & Rescher, N. (1959). On the epistemology of the inexact sciences. Management Science, 6(1), 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermet, G., Hassner, P., & Rupnik, J. (Eds.). (1984). Totalitarismes. Paris: Économica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, H. (1968). The alternative world future approach. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), New approaches to international relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, H. (2009). On escalation: Scenarios and metaphors. New York: Transaction. (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, F. (1991). The wizards of Armageddon. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, J. (1979). Dictatorships and double standards. Commentary, 68(5), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 13(4), 459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Bence, G. (1994). Anticipations of the failure of communism. Theory and Society, 23(2), 169–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1954). Terror and progress USSR: Some sources of change and stability in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pop, A. (2013). The 1989 revolutions in retrospect. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(2), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). Of clouds and clocks: An approach to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man, Chapter 6. In Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. L., & Russett, B. (1996). The future as an arbiter of theoretical controversies: Predictions, explanations and the end of the Cold War. British Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 441–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1998). Predicting the future: An introduction to the theory of forecasting. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. (1994). Global society and international relations: Sociological concepts and political perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. (2006). Groupthink versus the wisdom of crowds: The social epistemology of deliberation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, XLIV(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2006). Deliberating groups versus prediction markets (or Hayek’s challenge to Habermas). Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 3, 192–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P., & Mellers, B. (2011). Intelligent management of intelligence agencies: Beyond accountability ping-pong. American Psychologist, 6, 542–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd E. (1979). The final fall: An essay on the decomposition of the Soviet sphere (trans: Waggoner, J.). New York: Karz Publishers. (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1964). The stability of the bipolar world. Daedalus, 93, 881–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (Ed.). (1995). Towards a global civil society. Providence: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1994). The profession and vocation of politics. In, Political writings (trans: Speirs, R.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariel Colonomos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Colonomos, A. (2017). Selling the Future: Knowledge Brokers and their Responsibility. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_41-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_41-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics