Abstract
In an age of uncertainty, those who can anticipate revolution, the outbreak of wars, or which states might default are much in demand. The marketplace of ideas about the future is huge, and includes ‘wonks’, scholars and pundits who produce scenarios, predictions and ratings. The more opaque the future seems to be, the further the relationship between knowledge and power intensifies – above all the nexus between those who sell their expertise and those who consume it. This chapter discusses issues of responsibility that arise when experts make future claims.
References
Amalrik, A. (1970). Will the Soviet Union survive until 1984? New York: Harper & Row.
Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (trans: Ritter, M.). London: Sage.
Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bell, W. (1986). The American invasion of Grenada: A note on false prophecy. The Yale Review, 75(4), 564–586.
Bell, W. (2008). The American invasion of Grenada: A note on false prophecy. Foresight: The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 10(3), 27–42.
Berlin, I. (2013). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (1953).
Betz, G. (2006). Prediction or prophecy? The boundaries of economic foreknowledge and their socio-political consequences. Wiesbaden: Deutsche Universitäts-Verlag.
Bialer, S. (1986). The Soviet paradox: External expansion, internal decline. New York: Knopf.
Brzezinski, Z. (1969). Dilemmas of change in Soviet politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
CIA, Directorate of Intelligence. (1983, June). The slowdown in Soviet industry, 1976–1982. A Research Paper.
Collins, R. (1995). Prediction in macrosociology: The case of the Soviet collapse. American Journal of Sociology, 100(6), 1552–1593.
Colonomos, A. (2013). The gamble of war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Colonomos, A. (2016). Selling the future – The perils of predicting global politics. London/New York: Hurst and Oxford University Press.
d’Encausse, H. C. (1979). Decline of an empire: The Soviet socialist republics in revolt. New York: Newsweek Books. (1978).
Dalkey, N. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica: Rand/US Air Force Rand Project.
Dator, J. (2008). Futures, volume one and two: Then and now. Futures, 40(10), 903–906.
Davis, K., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (Eds.). (2012). Governance by indicators: Global power through quantification and rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deutsch, K. (1954). Cracks in the monolith: Possibilities and patterns of disintegration in totalitarian systems. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), Totalitarianism (pp. 308–333).
Engerman, D. (2009). Know your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America’s Soviet Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fleron, F. J. (Ed.). (1969). Communist studies and the social sciences: Essays on methodology and empirical theory. Washington, DC: Rand.
Friedrich, C. J. (Ed.). (1954). Totalitarianism: Proceedings of a conference held at the American academy of arts and sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Friedrich, C. J., & Brzezinski, Z. (Eds.). (1966). Totalitarianism, dictatorship and autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the future: Modernization theory in Cold War America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organisation, 46(1), 1–36.
Habermas J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere (trans: Burger, T.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (1962).
Habermas J. (1996). Between facts and norms (trans: Rehg, W.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (1992).
Habermas, J. (1998). Inclusion of the other. Cambridge: Polity Press. (1996).
Habermas J. (2001). The postnational constellation (trans: Pensky, M.). Cambridge: Polity Press. (1998).
Helmer, O., & Rescher, N. (1959). On the epistemology of the inexact sciences. Management Science, 6(1), 25.
Hermet, G., Hassner, P., & Rupnik, J. (Eds.). (1984). Totalitarismes. Paris: Économica.
Kahn, H. (1968). The alternative world future approach. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), New approaches to international relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Kahn, H. (2009). On escalation: Scenarios and metaphors. New York: Transaction. (1965).
Kaplan, F. (1991). The wizards of Armageddon. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (1983).
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kirkpatrick, J. (1979). Dictatorships and double standards. Commentary, 68(5), 45.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 13(4), 459.
Lipset, S. M., & Bence, G. (1994). Anticipations of the failure of communism. Theory and Society, 23(2), 169–210.
Moore, B. (1954). Terror and progress USSR: Some sources of change and stability in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pop, A. (2013). The 1989 revolutions in retrospect. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(2), 347–369.
Popper, K. (1972). Of clouds and clocks: An approach to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man, Chapter 6. In Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ray, J. L., & Russett, B. (1996). The future as an arbiter of theoretical controversies: Predictions, explanations and the end of the Cold War. British Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 441–470.
Rescher, N. (1998). Predicting the future: An introduction to the theory of forecasting. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Shaw, M. (1994). Global society and international relations: Sociological concepts and political perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Singer, P. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. London: Penguin.
Solomon, M. (2006). Groupthink versus the wisdom of crowds: The social epistemology of deliberation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, XLIV(1), 28–45.
Sunstein, C. (2006). Deliberating groups versus prediction markets (or Hayek’s challenge to Habermas). Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology, 3, 192–313.
Tetlock, P., & Mellers, B. (2011). Intelligent management of intelligence agencies: Beyond accountability ping-pong. American Psychologist, 6, 542–554.
Todd E. (1979). The final fall: An essay on the decomposition of the Soviet sphere (trans: Waggoner, J.). New York: Karz Publishers. (1976).
Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bentham Books.
Waltz, K. (1964). The stability of the bipolar world. Daedalus, 93, 881–909.
Walzer, M. (Ed.). (1995). Towards a global civil society. Providence: Berghahn Books.
Weber, M. (1994). The profession and vocation of politics. In, Political writings (trans: Speirs, R.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Colonomos, A. (2017). Selling the Future: Knowledge Brokers and their Responsibility. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_41-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_41-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities