Advertisement

The University as Engine for Anticipation: Stewardship, Modelling, Experimentation, and Critique in Public

  • Keri Facer
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter explores the historical orientation of universities to the future, arguing that Western research universities are characterized by four distinctive orientations to the future: stewardship (the preservation and care for knowledge, ways of being and diversity), experimentation and discovery (the use of experiment to produce new knowledge about and new realities within the world), modelling (the exploration of alternative potential future worlds through mathematical and imaginative means), and critique (the critical analysis of claims to the future, both internal and external). These orientations to the future have the potential to provide a powerful anticipatory resource for society. Historically, however, they have been allied to colonial and state-building projects, and today they risk capture by commercial interests. In the contemporary university, these future orientations are still present, distributed across disciplines. Three problems prevent their being harnessed as a powerful societal resource: the difficulties of building interdisciplinary collaborations within contemporary universities, the confusion over accountability and in whose service these resources should be used, and the tension over the forms of personhood that universities should be developing and for what ends. The chapter goes on to explore, through a study of over 300 collaborative projects, whether an emerging form of research practice – researching in public, through participatory and collaborative traditions – might offer a means of addressing these difficulties and opening up new opportunities for dialogue between the practices of stewardship, discovery, critique, and modelling within the university.

Keywords

University (Universities) Stewardship Experimentation Critique Reflexivity Modelling Anticipation Higher education History Enlightenment Personhood Future orientation Neoliberalism Debt Public (Publics) Participation Collaboration Interdisciplinarity Meta-reflexivity 

References

  1. Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters: Action, knowledge, ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amsler, S., & Facer, K. (2017). Contesting anticipatory regimes in education: Exploring alternative educational orientations to the future. Futures, 94, 6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, R. (2016). Understanding the University. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, A., & Born, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (1989/2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: SRHE/OUP.Google Scholar
  6. Bogost, I. (2013). Alien phenomenology: Or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2010). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs and incomes. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Cambridge: Allan & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. De Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South. Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder/London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, A. (2009). Relational Agency in Collaborations for the wellbeing of children and young people. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, A. (2017). Relational expertise: A cultural historical approach to teacher education. In M. Peters et al. (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Facer, K. (2016). Using the future in education: Creating space for openness, optimism and novelty. In H. Lees & N. Noddings (Eds.), Palgrave international handbook of alternative education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2014). Creating living knowledge: Community-university relationships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge. Bristol: AHRC/Connected Communities. https://connected-communities.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Creating-Living-Knowledge.Final_.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. Facer, K., & Pahl, K. (2017). Valuing interdisciplinary collaborative research: Beyond impact. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goddard, J., & Vallance, P. (2013). The University and the City. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Komljenovic, J. (2017). Market ordering as a device for market-making: The case of the emerging students’ recruitment industry. Globalisation, Societies and Education., 15(3), 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lassiter, E. (2004). The other side of Middletown: Exploring Muncie’s African-American Community. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  18. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979/1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lucas, L. (2014). Academic resistance in the UK: Challenging quality assurance processes in higher education. Policy and Society, 33(3), 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defence of the school: A public issue. Leuven: Education, Culture and Society.Google Scholar
  21. Nadin, M. (2016). Anticipation across disciplines. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newfield, C. (2003). Ivy & Industry: Business and the making of the American University 1880–1980. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poli, R. (2017). Introduction to anticipation studies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rhodes, F. (2001). The creation of the future: The role of the American University (p. 244). New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wei, I. (2016). In S. Eriksen (Ed.), The making of intellectual culture in Medieval Scandinavia, ca. 1150–1350 (pp. 77–101). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Wellmon, C. (2015). Organising enlightenment: Information overload and the invention of the modern research university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  27. Whitehead, A. F. (1938). Modes of thought (p. 233). New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  28. Whyte, W. (2015). Redbrick: A social and architectural history of Britain’s civic universities. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wittrock, B. (2010). The modern University: The three transformations. In S. Rothblatt & B. Wittrock (Eds.), The European and American University since (p. 1800). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wright, S. (2017). Can the University be a livable institution in the Anthropocene? In R. Deem & H. Eggins (Eds.), The University as a critical institution (pp. 17–37). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Young, M., & Muller, J. (2013). On the powers of powerful knowledge. Review of Education, 1(3), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations