Advertisement

“Communitarianism” and Patriotism

  • Vicki A. Spencer
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter examines the relationship between patriotism and communitarian thought in the 1980s with a specific focus on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre and Charles Taylor. Patriotism is not a forgone conclusion of communitarian commitments with Michael Walzer instead advocating a liberal neutral state in the case of the United States. Nonetheless, there is a strong correlation between the priority placed on the importance of cultural traditions and belonging, and the advocacy of greater communal solidarity and collective goals in the work of MacIntyre and Taylor that is equally evident in Michael Sandel’s critique of John Rawls’ Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971). Despite their common rejection of the communitarian label, these thinkers share a conception of the self as situated in its social relations so the question of identity is at the forefront of their concerns.

But little agreement exists among these thinkers about the kind of communal identification we ought to adopt, for patriotism is no more a distinct ideology than nationalism with the two terms becoming virtually synonymous in modern political discourse. Like Sandel, both MacIntyre and Taylor criticize the liberal neutral state that is characterized by citizens joining together as self-seeking maximizers to ensure the provision of collective goods that serve their individual interests. MacIntyre’s substantive patriotism that legitimates the patriot’s support for nonliberal nations differs significantly, however, from the republican patriotism, deep diversity, and cosmopolitan outlook that Taylor advocates in the interest of freedom and participatory self-rule.

Keywords

Belonging Communitarianism Community Cosmopolitanism Culture Diversity Ethnic nationalism Embedded self Identity Language MacIntyre, Alasdair Moderate patriotism Nationalism Quebec Republican patriotism Substantive patriotism Taylor, Charles Tradition Sandel, Michael Walzer, Michael 

References

  1. Anderson B (1991) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, rev. edn. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Appiah AK (1994) Identity, authenticity, survival: multicultural societies and social reproduction. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalism and “the politics of recognition”: an essay, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 149–163Google Scholar
  3. Barry B (2001) Culture and equality. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentham J (1843) Anarchical fallacies: being an examination of the declaration of rights issued during the French Revolution. In: John Bowring (ed) The works of Jeremy Bentham/published under the superintendence of his executor, vol. 2:489–534. Edinburgh. 11 vols. The Making of Modern Law. Gale, Cengage Learning. http://galenet.galegroup.com.ezproxy.otago.ac.nz/servlet/MOML?af=RN&ae=F100668238&srchtp=a&ste=14. Accessed 25 June 2017
  5. Berlin I (1969) Four essays on liberty. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Birnbaum P (1996) From multiculturalism to nationalism, (trans: Strong TB). Political Theory 24(1):33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connor W (1978) A nation is a nation, is a state, is an ethnic group, is a …. Ethn Racial Stud 1(4):377–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dietz MG (1989) Patriotism. In: Ball T, Farr J, Hanson RL (eds) Political innovation and conceptual change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–193Google Scholar
  9. Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Éducaloi (2017) Access to English schools in Quebec. https://www.educaloi.qc.ca/en/capsules/access-english-schools-quebec. Accessed 11 June 2017
  11. Freeden M (1998) Is nationalism a distinct ideology? Pol Stud 46(4):748–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gellner E (1983) Nations and nationalism. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Guibernau M (1999) Nations without states: political communities in a global age. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Guibernau M (2004) Anthony D. Smith on nations and national identity: a critical assessment. Nations Nationalism 10(1–2):125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms: contribution to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Keating M (2001) Nations against the state: the new politics of nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia, and Scotland, 2nd edn. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  17. Macintyre A (1981) After virtue: a study in moral theory. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Macintyre A (1984) Is patriotism a virtue? The Lindley lecture. University of Kansas, Kansas. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/12398/Is%20Patriotism%20a%20Virtue-1984.pdfGoogle Scholar
  19. Mill JS (1972) In: Acton HB (ed) Utilitarianism, liberty, representative government. J M Dent and Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Murdoch I (1970) Sovereignty of the good. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Nathanson S (1993) Patriotism, morality and peace. Rowman and Littlefied, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
  22. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Pazzanese C (2016) “People want politics to be about big things”: Michael Sandel’s passion for justice. Harvard Gazette. 5 April. http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2016/04/people-want-politics-to-be-about-big-things/. Accessed 12 January 2017
  24. Pettit P (1997) Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Rawls J (2005) Political liberalism, expanded edn. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Report of the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism Book 1: The Official Languages (1967) http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/bcp-pco/Z1-1963-1-5-1-1-eng.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2017
  28. Sandel M (1982) Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Seton-Watson H (1977) Nations and states: an enquiry into the origins of nations and the politics of nationalism. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor C (1985a) Human agency and language: philosophical papers, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor C (1985b) Philosophy and the human sciences: philosophical papers, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor C (1989) Cross-purposes: the liberal-communitarian debate. In: Rosenblum NL (ed) Liberalism and the moral life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 159–182Google Scholar
  33. Taylor C (1992) The politics of recognition. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalism and “the politics of recognition”. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 25–73Google Scholar
  34. Taylor C (1993) In: Laforest G (ed) Reconciling the solitudes: essays on Canadian federalism and nationalism. McGill-Queen’s University Press, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor C (1994) Charles Taylor replies. In: Tully J, Weinstock D (eds) Philosophy in an age of pluralism: the philosophy of Charles Taylor in question. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 213–257Google Scholar
  36. Taylor C (1999a) Conditions of an unforced consensus on human rights. In: Bauer JR, Bell DR (eds) The east Asian challenge for human rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 124–144Google Scholar
  37. Taylor C (1999b) Nationalism and modernity. In: Beiner R (ed) Theorizing nationalism. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 219–245Google Scholar
  38. Taylor C (2002) Why democracy needs patriotism. In: Cohen J (ed) For love of country. Beacon Press, Boston, pp 119–121Google Scholar
  39. Walzer M (1974) Civility and civic virtue in contemporary America. Soc Res 41(4):593–611Google Scholar
  40. Walzer M (1992) Comment. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalism and “the politics of recognition”. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 99–103Google Scholar
  41. Walzer M (2004) What does it mean to be an “American”? Soc Res 71(3):633–654Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations