Abstract
The term “moderate patriotism” was introduced to show that there are alternatives to nationalist and xenophobic types of patriotism. While extreme patriotism involves concern for one’s own country and no concern for others, moderate patriotism combines special concern for one’s country with some level of concern for people in other countries. Extreme patriotism sets the highest importance on promoting the country’s interests and well-being while rejecting any constraints on the means by which this may be done. Moderate patriotism also promotes the country’s well-being, but it only approves of means that are consistent with the rights of people in other countries.
Moderate patriotism faces criticisms from two sides. Extreme patriots reject it for not being patriotic enough. Global universalists (also called cosmopolitans) reject moderate patriotism because patriotism gives priority to the needs and interests of its own country and fails to treat all people of all countries equally.
An important but neglected issue for moderate patriots concerns the extent of the duties that moderate patriots have to people of other countries. How much must moderate patriots do to help non-compatriots? While this chapter presents no solution, it describes four possible levels of duties of assistance to foreign people, all of which differ in the type of duties that are recognized and the degree of demandingness that each type accepts.
In the course of describing the criticisms of patriotism by global universalists, one thing that emerges is that there are at least two forms of global universalism, one of which adheres to a strict form of equality for all and the second of which allows some degree of partiality, including patriotic partiality. This second view remains distinct from patriotism, but it narrows the gap between a form of globalism and moderate patriotism.
Other topics that are discussed include (1) how to define patriotism and its subspecies, (2) whether being patriotic is a duty for all people (3) how priority to some people can be compatible with belief in all people being morally equal, and (4) an analysis of Alistair MacIntyre’s criticisms of moderate patriotism. In the conclusion, several areas for further research are described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baron M (1989) Patriotism and ‘Liberal’ Morality. Reprinted 2002. In: Primoratz I (ed) Patriotism. Humanity, Amherst
Bar-Tal D, Staub E (eds) (1997) Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations. Nelson Hall, Chicago
Beitz C. International liberalism and distributive justice. Quoted in Tan K-C (2003) Patriotic obligations. In: Chatterjee D (ed) Moral distance. The Monist 86:3, p 450n3
Buchanan A (2005) In the National Interest. In: Brock G, Brighouse H (eds) The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 110–111
Goodin R (1988) What is so special about our countrymen? Ethics 98:663–686
Hooker B (2000) Ideal code, real world. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Keller S (2005) Patriotism as bad faith. Ethics 115:562–593
Keller S (2007) The limits of loyalty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kymlicka W (2001) Territorial boundaries: a liberal egalitarian perspective. In: Miller D, Hashmi S (eds) Boundaries and justice: diverse ethical perspectives. Princeton University Press, Princeton
LaMothe R (2015) Imaginary love: patriotism as transitional phenomena. In: Hulas M, Fel S (eds) (2015) Intricacies of patriotism. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp 81–82, 96–98
MacIntyre Alistair (1984) Is patriotism a virtue? Reprinted In: Primoratz I (ed) Patriotism. Humanity, Amherst
Nathanson S (1989) In defense of ‘moderate patriotism’. Ethics 99, pp 535–552. Reprinted 2002 In: Primoratz I (ed) Patriotism. Humanity, Amherst
Nathanson S (1993) Patriotism, morality, and peace. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, pp 34–35
Nathanson S (2011) Partiality. In: Chatterjee D (ed) Encyclopedia of global justice. Springer, Heidelberg
Nathanson S (2016) Immigration, citizenship, and the clash between partiality and impartiality. In: Cudd A, Lee W-c (eds) Citizenship and immigration – borders, migration and political membership in a global age. Springer, Switzerland
Nussbaum M (1996) Patriotism and cosmopolitanism. In: Cohen J (ed) For the love of country. Beacon, Boston, p 13
Pogge T. “An egalitarian law of peoples.” Cited in Tan K-C (2003) Patriotic obligations. In: Chatterjee D (ed) Moral distance. The Monist 86:3, 436, 450n7
Primoratz I (2013) Patriotism. In. Zalta E (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/patriotism/
Schaar J (1981) The case for covenanted patriotism. In: Primoratz I (ed) Patriotism. Humanity, Amherst, p 233
Scheffler S (2001) Conceptions of cosmopolitanism. In: Boundaries and allegiances. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. Philos Public Aff 1:1
Singer P (2002) One world. Yale University Press, New Haven
Tan, K-C (2003) Patriotic obligations. In Chatterjee D (ed) Moral distance. The Monist 86:3, pp 434–453
Tolstoy L (1987) On patriotism. In: Writings on civil disobedience and nonviolence. New Society, New York, pp 97–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nathanson, S. (2017). Moderate Patriotism. In: Sardoc, M. (eds) Handbook of Patriotism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_26-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_26-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30534-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30534-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities