Advertisement

A New World Is Already Here: Lessons from Radically Different Organizations

  • Lenette SchuijtEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

In the past 15–20 years, hundreds of experimental organizations have been initiated, from start-ups to collectives and cooperatives to networks and communities. Together, these organizations, however small in size and scope, can be viewed as an “undercurrent” of a new organizational reality. These new forms of organizing are based on radically different premises and depart from a totally different paradigm. This new paradigm gives way to creativity and innovation and requires a personal transformation of the leaders and/or initiators. This chapter first provides a philosophical overview of how the organizational paradigm is shifting. It then describes nine characteristics that set undercurrent organizations apart from classic bureaucracies and illustrates this with the case study of “Buurtzorg.” It also describes a few characteristics of leadership within undercurrent organizations. To draw lessons from undercurrent organizations, we first discuss to what extent and how bureaucracies can implement the principles from undercurrent organizations. This chapter concludes with lessons from undercurrent ways of organizing for those who want to start their own, pioneers for a new time, and with the personal transformation that such a start would require from them.

Keywords

Transition Transformation Paradigm shift Undercurrent organizations Pioneers 

References

  1. Birkinshaw J (2010) Reinventing management. Smarter choices for getting work done. Wiley, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. Bregman R (2016) Waarom de baas van Buurtzorg de baas van Nederland zou moeten zijn. De Correspondent, 29 Aug 2016. https://decorrespondent.nl/5147/waarom-de-baas-van-buurtzorg-de-baas-van-nederland-zou-moeten-zijn/451501211986-001870d9
  3. Carney B, Getz I (2009) Freedom, Inc. free your employees and let them lead your business to higher productivity, profits and growth. Crown Business/Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. de Blok J, Pool A (2010) Buurtzorg: menselijkheid boven bureaucratie. Boom Lemma, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  5. de Sitter U (1981) Op weg naar nieuwe fabrieken en kantoren. Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  6. Drath WH (2001) The deep blue sea: rethinking the source of leadership. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Dweck C (2006) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Ballantine/Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamel G (2007) The future of management. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamel G (2011) First let’s fire all the managers. Harvard Business Review, Dec 2011Google Scholar
  10. Home Care by Self-Governing Nursing Teams: The Netherlands’ Buurtzorg Model. Commonwealth Fund. 29 May 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2015Google Scholar
  11. Huijbers P (2010) Care in the neighbourhood: better home care at reduced cost. Interlinks. Retrieved 17 May 2016. http://interlinks.euro.centre.org/model/example/NeighbourhoodCareBetterHomeCareAtReducedCost
  12. Jackson T (2009) Prosperity without growth. Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan/Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  13. Johansen B (2007) Get there early: sensing the future to compete in the present. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellerman B (2012) The end of leadership. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Kotter J, Heskett J (2011) Corporate culture and performance. Free Press/Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. KPMG/Plexus (2015) De toegevoegde waarde van Buurtzorg t.o.v. andere aanbieders van thuiszorg. Een kwantitatieve analyse van thuiszorg in Nederland anno 2013Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn T (1962, 1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuipers H, van Amelsvoort P, Kramer EH (2010) Het Nieuwe Organiseren. Alternatieven voor de bureaucratie. uitgeverij Acco, Leuven/Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  19. Marichal K, Maenen S (2015) Naar een new deal voor leidinggevenden in innovatieve arbeidsorganisatie. Research description: http://tfli.be/solutions-leadershipresearch-2/
  20. McGregor D (1960) The human side of enterprise. McGrawHill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit: strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturing’. J Account Econ 19(2/3):179–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Myers K, Sadaghiani K (2010) Millennials in the workplace: a communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance. J Bus Psychol 25(2):225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nandram S (2014) Organizational innovation by integrating simplification: learning from Buurtzorg Nederland. Springer, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  24. Neal J (2006) Edgewalkers. Praeger Publications, WestportGoogle Scholar
  25. Neal J (2011) Edgewalker organizations. In: Bouckaert L, Zsolnai L (eds) Handbook of spirituality and business. Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Parker M (2002) Against management. Polity Press/Blackwell, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Pettigrew A, Whittington R (2003) Complementarities in action: organizational change and performance in BP and Unilever 1985–2002. In: Pettigrew A et al (eds) Innovative forms of organizing. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Rotmans J (2012) In het oog van de orkaan. Aeneas, BoxtelGoogle Scholar
  29. Rotmans J, Loorbach DA (2008) Transition management: reflexive governance of societal complexity through searching, learning and experimenting. In: Bergh JC v d, Bruisma FR (eds) Managing the transition to renewable energy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 15–46. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/37236 Google Scholar
  30. Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schuijt L (2014) Wat bezielt ons? Van verstarring naar vitaliteit. Vakmedianet, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  32. Trist E, Bamforth K (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Human Relations 4:3–38, p.14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van den Brink G, van Hulst M, De Graaf L, van der Pennen T (2012) Best persons. Boom Lemma, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  34. Winter C (2014) This Dutch wunderkind now has the funds to build his ocean cleanup machine. Bloomberg Businessweek, 16 Sept 2014Google Scholar
  35. Zomerdijk C, van der Zwan C (2009) Weg met de bureaucratie in de thuiszorg. Managementsite, 29 Sept 2009. https://www.managementsite.nl/weg-bureaucratie-thuiszorg-alles-telt-relatie-tussen-medewerker-klant-deel-2

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crystal River ConsultancyAmersfoortNetherlands

Personalised recommendations