Advertisement

Neonatology pp 315-321 | Cite as

Guidelines and Protocols for Newborns

  • Rinaldo ZaniniEmail author
  • Roberto Bellù
Reference work entry

Abstract

The principal aim of the guidelines is to offer recommendations to assist in clinical decisions. In neonatology systematic evaluation of scientific evidence is even more important than in other fields because of variability between the methodology of clinical studies and the difficulty to perform studies in the neonatal population. Guidelines are “statements that include recommendations, intended to optimize patient care, that are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options.” In this framework they can help clinicians and healthcare providers in taking best decisions in specific conditions and setting. Methodology issues are of paramount importance in developing and evaluating guidelines. The GRADE approach is actually the standard framework to develop clinical guidelines. From an evaluation point of view, according to an approach to systematically develop guidelines, the AGREE II approach reached an elevated degree of validity and feasibility also for busy clinician and healthcare operator. Based on evidence-based guidelines, clinical pathways emerged as an important way to implement guidelines at the local level, looking at the specific processes of a given patient. Evidence-based guidelines can be effective in improving patient care; the focus is increasingly shifting toward how to encourage the use of guidelines throughout clinical practice. CP framework is one of the most promising approaches to reach this goal.

References

  1. AGREE Collaboration (2003) Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Safety Health Care 12:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S, GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellù R, Zanini R (2001) Sono valide le Linee Guida che utilizziamo in reparto? Riv Ital Pediatr 27:645–650Google Scholar
  4. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Hanna SE, Littlejohns P, Makarski J, Zitzelsberger L, AGREE Next Steps Consortium (2010) AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol. 63:1308–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Hanna SE, Littlejohns P, Makarski J, Zitzelsberger L, AGREE Next Steps Consortium (2012) The Global Rating Scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 65:526–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell H, Hotchkiss R, Bradshaw N, Porteous M (1998) Integrated care pathways. BMJ 316:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Consensus Report, Institute of Medicine (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2011/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-We-Can-Trust/Clinical%20Practice%20Guidelines%202011%20Report%20Brief.pdf. Accessed on 23 Oct 2016
  8. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A et al (2000) Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 355:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kinsman L, Rotter T, James E, Snow P, Willis J (2010) What is a clinical pathway? Development of a definition to inform the debate. BMC Med 8:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurtin P, Stucky E (2009) Standardize to excellence: improving the quality and safety of care with clinical pathway. Pediatr Clin N Am 56:893–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawal AK, Rotter T, Kinsman L, Machotta A, Ronellenfitsch U, Scott SD, Goodridge D, Plishka C, Groot G (2016) What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review. BMC Med 14:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Brozek J, Akl EA, Walter SD, Norman G, Kulasegaram M, Christensen R, Guyatt GH, Falck-Ytter Y, Chang S, Murad MH, Vist GE, Lasserson T, Gartlehner G, Shukla V, Sun X, Whittington C, Post PN, Lang E, Thaler K, Kunnamo I, Alenius H, Meerpohl JJ, Alba AC, Nevis IF, Gentles S, Ethier MC, Carrasco-Labra A, Khatib R, Nesrallah G, Kroft J, Selk A, Brignardello-Petersen R, Schünemann HJ (2013) The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses. J Clin Epidemiol 66:736–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neumann I, Santesso N, Akl EA, Rind DM, Vandvik PO, Alonso-Coello P, Agoritsas T, Mustafa RA, Alexander PE, Schünemann H, Guyatt GH (2016) A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol 72:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and Nuffield Institute for Health (1994) Implementing clinical guidelines. Can guidelines be used to improve clinical practice? Effective Health Care 1:1–12Google Scholar
  16. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J (2010) Clinicalpathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stayand hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006632Google Scholar
  17. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J (1999) Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA 281:1900–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) (1993) Program note: clinical practice guidelines development. AHCPR publication no. 93-0023. US Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NICU, Ospedale ManzoniLeccoItaly

Personalised recommendations