Effects of Catching Method, Rigor Status at Processing, and Pre-salting Methods on the Water Distribution and Characteristics of Heavily Salted Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Muscle: A Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Study
The distribution and characteristics of water in the muscle of various commercially available Icelandic heavily salted Atlantic cod products were analyzed with proton magnetic resonance methods. The products varied in choice of catching method, in pre- or post-rigor processing, flattening or filleting cut, and pre-salting technique (brine injection with salt with/without polyphosphates, brining and pickling) and choice of brine-injection instruments.
All products had heterogeneous water distributions, but the level of heterogeneity was dependent on the handling during processing. Brine injection led to salt-induced swelling, which effect remained after the kench dry salting step. Double brine injection induced needle traces in the muscle, even after kench salting. Relaxation time analysis indicated that pickle salted products had the highest degree of protein denaturation in the muscle amongst the analyzed pre-salting methods. The multi-parametric analysis indicated how powerful the MR methods are for process and product characterization and optimization.
KeywordsHeavily salted cod (bacalao) Catching method Salting methods Rigor status MRI NMR Physicochemical properties
- 17.AOAC 976.18. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Arlington: AOAC; 2000.Google Scholar
- 18.AOAC-969.31. Assoc of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington: AOAC; 1990.Google Scholar
- 22.Carr HY, Purcell EM. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Am J Physiol. 1954;94:630–8.Google Scholar
- 25.Gudjonsdottir M, Gunnlaugsson VN, Finnbogadottir GA, Sveinsdottir K, Magnusson H, Arason S, Rustad T. Process control of lightly salted wild and farmed Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) by brine injection, brining, and freezing – a low field NMR study. J Food Sci. 2010;75(8):E527–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Goncalves AA, Ribeiro JSD. Do phosphates improve the seafood quality? Reality and legislation. Pan-Am J Aquat Sci. 2008;3(3):237–47.Google Scholar
- 28.Lampila LE. Functions and uses of phosphates in the seafood industry. J Aquat Food Prod Technol. 1992;1(3/4):29–41.Google Scholar
- 32.Gudjónsdóttir M, Jónsson Á, Bergsson AB, Arason S, Rustad T. Shrimp processing assessed by low field nuclear magnetic resonance, near infrared spectroscopy and physicochemical measurements – the effect of polyphosphate content and length of prebrining on shrimp muscle. J Food Sci. 2011a;76(4):E357–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Thorarinsdottir KA, Arason S, Thorkelsson G. The role and fate of added phosphates in salted cod products. Report 27–10. Matís Icelandic Food and Biotech R&D; 2010b. p. 33.Google Scholar