Advertisement

The Transferred NOE

  • Mike P. Williamson
Reference work entry

Abstract

The transferred NOE (TrNOE, also called exchange-transferred NOE, et-NOE) is an experimental modification of the NOE experiment, designed to provide information on the structure of a receptor-bound ligand that is present in excess, and is in fast exchange between free and bound states. It is normally observed using a NOESY experiment that includes a relaxation filter to remove interfering signals from the receptor. NOEs develop on the bound ligand but are observed on the spectrum of the free ligand following dissociation from the complex. It is a useful experiment, though it is necessary to carry out suitable controls, to demonstrate that (a) the NOEs are those from specific binding and not from weak nonspecific binding; (b) the NOEs observed are genuinely from the bound ligand, not the free ligand; and (c) the NOEs do not arise from spin diffusion. Incorporation of specific labeling patterns in the ligand and receptor can improve the signal-to-noise ratio and information content. The TrNOE works best for relatively weak complexes (dissociation constant 100 nM or weaker) and for larger receptors (>30 kDa up to very large, which can therefore include membrane-bound receptors and even whole cells). The TrNOE is closely related to saturation transfer difference (STD) and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST).

Keywords

Saturation transfer difference Chemical exchange saturation transfer Exchange-transferred NOE Relaxation NOESY Spin-lattice relaxation Correlation time Cross-relaxation Spin diffusion Fast exchange Drug development ROE 

References

  1. 1.
    Neuhaus D, Williamson MP. The nuclear Overhauser effect in structural and conformational analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-VCH; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mayer M, Meyer B. Characterization of ligand binding by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38:1784–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anthis NJ, Clore GM. Visualizing transient dark states by NMR spectroscopy. Q Rev Biophys. 2015;48:35–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Post CB. Exchange-transferred NOE spectroscopy and bound ligand structure determination. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003;13:581–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vögeli B. The nuclear Overhauser effect from a quantitative perspective. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2014;78:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korshavn KJ, Bhunia A, Lim MH, Ramamoorthy A. Amyloid-β adopts a conserved, partially folded structure upon binding to zwitterionic lipid bilayers prior to amyloid formation. Chem Commun. 2016;52:882–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Potenza D, Belvisi L. Transferred-NOE NMR experiments on intact human platelets: receptor-bound conformation of RGD-peptide mimics. Org Biomol Chem. 2008;6:258–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lancelot N, Piotto M, Theret I, Lesur B, Hennig P. Applications of NMR screening techniques to the pharmaceutical target Checkpoint kinase 1. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014;93:125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scherf T, Anglister J. A T-filtered two-dimensional transferred NOE spectrum for studying antibody interactions with peptide antigens. Biophys J. 1993;64:754–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ni F. Recent developments in transferred NOE methods. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 1994;26:517–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Srivastava G, Moseri A, Kessler N, Akabayov SR, Arshava B, Naider F, et al. Detection of intermolecular transferred NOEs in large protein complexes using asymmetric deuteration: HIV-1 gp120 in complex with a CCR5 peptide. FEBS J. 2016;283:4084–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siebert HC, Jiménez-Barbero J, André S, Kaltner H, Gabius HJ. Describing topology of bound ligand by transferred nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy and molecular modeling. Methods Enzymol. 2003;362:417–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gizachew D, Dratz E. Transferred NOESY NMR studies of biotin mimetic peptide (FSHPQNT) bound to streptavidin: a structural model for studies of peptide-protein interactions. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011;78:14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arepalli SR, Glaudemans CPJ, Daves GD, Kovac P, Bax A. Identification of protein-mediated indirect NOE effects in a disaccharide-Fab’ complex by transferred ROESY. J Magn Reson Ser B. 1995;106:195–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fawzi NL, Ying J, Ghirlando R, Torchia DA, Clore GM. Atomic-resolution dynamics on the surface of amyloid-β protofibrils probed by solution NMR. Nature. 2011;480:268–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vallurupalli P, Bouvignies G, Kay LE. Studying “invisible” excited protein states in slow exchange with a major state conformation. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:8148–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abayev M, Srivastava G, Arshava B, Naider F, Anglister J. Detection of intermolecular transferred-NOE interactions in small and medium size protein complexes: RANTES complexed with a CCR5 N-terminal peptide. FEBS J. 2017;284:586–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baek M-H, Kamiya M, Kushibiki T, Nakazumi T, Tomisawa S, Abe C, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-bound structure of the antimicrobial peptide cecropin P1 determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Pept Sci. 2016;22:214–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guzzi C, Alfarano P, Sutkeviciute I, Sattin S, Ribeiro-Viana R, Fieschi F, et al. Detection and quantitative analysis of two independent binding modes of a small ligand responsible for DC-SIGN clustering. Org Biomol Chem. 2016;14:335–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wälti MA, Riek R, Orts J. Fast NMR-based determination of the 3D structure of the binding site of protein-ligand complexes with weak affinity binders. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:5208–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orts J, Wälti MA, Marsh M, Vera L, Gossert AD, Güntert P, et al. NMR-based determination of the 3D structure of the ligand-protein interaction site without protein resonance assignment. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:4393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Piserchio A, Ramakrishan V, Wang H, Kaoud TS, Arshava B, Dutta K, et al. Structural and dynamic features of F-recruitment site driven substrate phosphorylation by ERK2. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Canales A, Nieto L, Rodríguez-Salarichs J, Sánchez-Murcia PA, Coderch C, Cortés-Cabrera A, et al. Molecular recognition of epothilones by microtubules and tubulin dimers revealed by biochemical and NMR approaches. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9:1033–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Esaki K, Yoshinaga S, Tsuji T, Toda E, Terashima Y, Saitoh T, et al. Structural basis for the binding of the membrane-proximal C-terminal region of chemokine receptor CCR2 with the cytosolic regulator FROUNT. FEBS J. 2014;281:5552–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vasile F, Reina JJ, Potenza D, Heggelund JE, Mackenzie A, Krengel U, et al. Comprehensive analysis of blood group antigen binding to classical and El Tor cholera toxin B-pentamers by NMR. Glycobiology. 2014;24:766–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hanashima S, Sato C, Tanaka H, Takahashi T, Kitajima K, Yamaguchi Y. NMR study into the mechanism of recognition of the degree of polymerization by oligo/polysialic acid antibodies. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21:6069–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saravanan R, Joshi M, Mohanram H, Bhunia A, Mangoni ML, Bhattacharjya S. NMR structure of Temporin-1 Ta in lipopolysaccharide micelles: Mechanistic insight into inactivation by outer membrane. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thépaut M, Guzzi C, Sutkeviciute I, Sattin S, Ribeiro-Viana R, Varga N, et al. Structure of a glycomimetic ligand in the carbohydrate recognition domain of C-type lectin DC-SIGN. Structural requirements for selectivity and ligand design. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:2518–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robbins KJ, Liu G, Selmani V, Lazo ND. Conformational analysis of thioflavin T bound to the surface of amyloid fibrils. Langmuir. 2012;28:16490–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Enríquez-Navas PM, Marradi M, Padro D, Angulo J, Penadés S. A solution NMR study of the interactions of oligomannosides and the anti-HIV-1 2G12 antibody reveals distinct binding modes for branched ligands. Chem Eur J. 2011;17:1547–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Biology and BiotechnologyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations