SNIF-NMR Applications in an Economic Context: Fraud Detection in Food Products

Reference work entry

Abstract

The SNIF-NMR method is now since more than three decades established as a powerful technique for controlling the origin of food commodities. The method provides a unique tool for detecting whether a given main component of a food or beverage has been substituted or diluted by the addition of a substance with the same molecular formula but from a different chemical, botanical, or geographical origin, based on the site-specific distribution of stable isotopes within molecules. In order to illustrate the performance of SNIF-NMR applied in economic contexts, several examples of applications to economically important food products are presented: wines & spirits, vinegar, fruit juices, sugar syrups and natural flavouring substances.

It is shown that studying the above properties allows to check the compliance with legal definitions, and to detect potential economically motivated adulteration. Early applications involved deuterium-NMR only, but recent developments extended the application of the technique to carbon 13 NMR. Multi-component and multi-isotope strategies have also been developed to push the limits of detection of adulterations to an optimum. Alternative site-specific strategies using Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry are also used in specific cases.

Finally suitable automatization tools and quality assurance conditions have been defined to ensure reproducible application of SNIF-NMR methods in several expert laboratories worldwide.

Keywords

Authenticity Food fraud Deuterium NMR Carbon 13 NMR Stable isotopes 

References

  1. 1.
    Martin GJ, Martin ML. Deuterium labelling at the natural abundance level as studied by high field quantitative 2H NMR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981;22(36):3525–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin GJ, Martin ML. Brevet France, 81-22710; Europe, 82-402-209-9; USA, 85-4-550-082; Japan. 1981;57–123–2Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 on the common organisation of the market in wine.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Regulations (EC) No 606/2009 and 607/2009 laying down certain additional rules for oenological practices, processes, protected designations of origin and geographical indications, traditional terms and labelling.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Regulation (EC) No 1601/91 laying down general rules on the definition, description and presentation of aromatized wines, aromatized wine- based drinks and aromatized wine-product cocktails.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Regulations (EC) No 479/2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine, and Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    NORMA NMX-FF-110-SCFI-2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang BL. Hydrogen isotopic profile in the characterization of sugars. Influence of the metabolic pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(6):1574–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin GJ, et al. Deuterium transfer in the bioconversion of glucose to ethanol studied by specific labeling at the natural abundance level. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108(17):5116–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perini M, et al. Stable isotope ratio Analysis for verifying the authenticity of balsamic and wine vinegar. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62(32):8197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas F, et al. Improved characterization of the botanical origin of sugar by carbon-13 SNIF-NMR applied to ethanol. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(22):11580–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tenailleau E. Authentication of the origin of vanillin using quantitative natural abundance 13C NMR. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(26):7782–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Day MP, et al. 13C-IRIS: an improved method to detect the addition of low levels of C4-derived sugars to juices. J AOAC Int. 2001;84(3):957–63.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gonzalez J, et al. Specific natural isotope profile studied by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (SNIP−IRMS): 13C/12C ratios of fructose, glucose, and sucrose for improved detection of sugar addition to pineapple juices and concentrates. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47(6):2316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas F, et al. 18O internal referencing method to detect water addition in wines and fruit juices: interlaboratory study. J AOAC Int. 2013;96(3):615–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jamin E, et al. Proteins as intermolecular isotope reference for detection of adulteration of fruit juices. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46(12):5118–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jamin E, et al. Detection of exogenous citric acid in fruit juices by stable isotope ratio analysis. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(13):5130–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Martin YL. A global approach to accurate and automatic quantitative analysis of NMR spectra by complex least-squares curve fitting. J Magn Reson Ser A. 1994;111(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Food analysis using isotopic techniques – proficiency testing scheme. http://www.eurofins.com/food-and-feed-testing/food-testing-services/authenticity/fit-pts. Accessed 22 June 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eurofins Analytics FranceNantesFrance

Personalised recommendations