Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Washington University Sentence Completion Test

  • Jessica JorgensonEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_959-1

Synonyms

Definition

A 36-item projective, psychometric test used to assess an individual’s placement along a continuum of psychological maturity referred to as ego development.

Introduction

The Washington University Sentence Completion Test (SCT; Loevinger and Wessler 1970) is a widely used projective technique for assessing personality (Vincent et al. 2015). The SCT consists of 36 sentence stems (e.g., “A woman (man) should always…” and “If I can’t get what I want…”) that are completed by the participant and rated using a comprehensive scoring manual. Using ogive rules (i.e., cumulative frequency), scores on each item are combined, and the respondent is classified into one of eight stages of development: Impulsive (E2), Self-Protective (E3), Conformist (E4), Self-Aware (E5), Conscientious (E6), Individualistic (E7), Autonomous (E8), or Integrated (E9) (Loevinger 1998; Vincent et al. 2015).

History

The origin of the SCT can be traced back to the Family Problems Scale, an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cook-Greuter, S. R. (1999). Post-autonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  2. Hansell, S., Sparacino, J., Ronchi, D., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1985). Ego development responses in written questionnaires and telephone interviews. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1118–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hart, B., & Hilton, I. (1988). Dimensions of personality organization as predictors of teenage pregnancy risk. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 116–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Holt, R. R. (1980). Loevinger’s measure of ego development: Reliability and national norms for male and female short forms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 909–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hy, L., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 55–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Loevinger, J. (1998). Technical foundations for measuring ego development: The Washington University Sentence Completion Test. Mahwah: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  8. Loevinger, J., & Wessler, R. (1970). Measuring ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Manners, J., & Durkin, K. (2001). A critical review of the validity of ego development theory and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 541–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Novy, D. M., & Francis, D. J. (1992). Psychometric properties of the Washington Sentence Completion Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1029–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Novy, D. M., Blumentritt, T. L., Nelson, D. V., & Gaa, A. (1997). The Washington Sentence Completion Test: Are the two halves alternate forms? Are the female and male forms comparable? Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 616–627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sullivan, C., Grant, M. Q., & Grant, J. D. (1957). The development of interpersonal maturity: Applications to delinquency. Psychiatry, 20, 373–385. 1959-03381-001.Google Scholar
  13. Vincent, N., Ward, L., & Denson, L. (2015). Promoting post-conventional consciousness in leaders: Australian community leadership programs. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bradley A. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA