Skip to main content

Validity Scales

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 182 Accesses

Definition

Scales developed as a means of quantifying the quality of information provided by a respondent and determining the level of confidence the test-giver can have that the resulting substantive scale(s) will be meaningfully associated with the external correlates seen in the research literature.

Introduction

Objective personality assessment relies on the direct disclosure of information by the individual being assessed (i.e., self-report) or by others familiar with the individual (i.e., informant report). With face-valid questionnaire items, the assessment process becomes a meaningful communication between the test-giver and the test-taker, collecting valuable data in a structured and consistent manner across respondents. Despite the wealth of information provided via personality inventories, the predictive utility for individual cases can be undermined by intentional or unintentional biases in the respondent’s reporting. Validity scales were developed as a means of quantifying...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anestis, J., Finn, J. A., Gottfried, E., Arbisi, P. A., & Joiner, T. (2015). Reading the road signs: The utility of the MMPI-2 restructured form validity scales in prediction of premature termination. Assessment, 22, 279–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2003). Assessing personality and psychopathology with self-report inventories. In I. B. Weiner, J. R. Graham, & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (pp. 553–577). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., & Perry, J. N. (2008). Personality assessment in treatment planning: Use of the MMPI-2 and BTPI. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragon, W. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Handel, R. W. (2012). Examining the impact of unscorable item responses on the validity and interpretability of MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF restructured clinical (RC) scale scores. Assessment, 19, 101–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2015). Dichotomous versus polytomous response options for psychopathology assessment: Method or meaningful variance? Psychological Assessment, 27, 184–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R. (2012). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Archer, R. P. (2010). Psychometric functioning of the MMPI-2-RF VRIN-r and TRIN-r scales with varying degrees of randomness, acquiescence, and counter-acquiescence. Psychological Assessment, 22, 87–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 450–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (2012). Detection of response bias in applied assessment: Comment on McGrath et al. (2010). Psychological Injury and Law, 5, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (2008). An introduction to response styles. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 3–13). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, M. L., Larrabee, G. J., Greiffenstein, M. F., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Lees-Haley, P., Green, P., & Greve, K. W. (2011). A misleading review of response bias: Comment on McGrath, Mitchell, Kim, and Hough (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 708–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob A. Finn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Finn, J.A., Anestis, J.C. (2017). Validity Scales. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_958-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_958-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics