Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Validity Scales

  • Jacob A. FinnEmail author
  • Joye C. Anestis
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_958-1

Definition

Scales developed as a means of quantifying the quality of information provided by a respondent and determining the level of confidence the test-giver can have that the resulting substantive scale(s) will be meaningfully associated with the external correlates seen in the research literature.

Introduction

Objective personality assessment relies on the direct disclosure of information by the individual being assessed (i.e., self-report) or by others familiar with the individual (i.e., informant report). With face-valid questionnaire items, the assessment process becomes a meaningful communication between the test-giver and the test-taker, collecting valuable data in a structured and consistent manner across respondents. Despite the wealth of information provided via personality inventories, the predictive utility for individual cases can be undermined by intentional or unintentional biases in the respondent’s reporting. Validity scales were developed as a means of quantifying...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anestis, J., Finn, J. A., Gottfried, E., Arbisi, P. A., & Joiner, T. (2015). Reading the road signs: The utility of the MMPI-2 restructured form validity scales in prediction of premature termination. Assessment, 22, 279–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2003). Assessing personality and psychopathology with self-report inventories. In I. B. Weiner, J. R. Graham, & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (pp. 553–577). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Butcher, J. N., & Perry, J. N. (2008). Personality assessment in treatment planning: Use of the MMPI-2 and BTPI. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dragon, W. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Handel, R. W. (2012). Examining the impact of unscorable item responses on the validity and interpretability of MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF restructured clinical (RC) scale scores. Assessment, 19, 101–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Finn, J. A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2015). Dichotomous versus polytomous response options for psychopathology assessment: Method or meaningful variance? Psychological Assessment, 27, 184–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Graham, J. R. (2012). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Archer, R. P. (2010). Psychometric functioning of the MMPI-2-RF VRIN-r and TRIN-r scales with varying degrees of randomness, acquiescence, and counter-acquiescence. Psychological Assessment, 22, 87–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010). Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 450–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morey, L. C. (2012). Detection of response bias in applied assessment: Comment on McGrath et al. (2010). Psychological Injury and Law, 5, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rogers, R. (2008). An introduction to response styles. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 3–13). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rohling, M. L., Larrabee, G. J., Greiffenstein, M. F., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Lees-Haley, P., Green, P., & Greve, K. W. (2011). A misleading review of response bias: Comment on McGrath, Mitchell, Kim, and Hough (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 708–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care SystemMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.The University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bradley A. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA