Skip to main content

Draw-a-Person Tests

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Definition

Draw-a-person tests are intended to assess intelligence or psychopathology by having an individual draw a human figure during a short period of time and then interpreting the drawing in accordance with a scoring system.

History and Current Status

These tests are part of the rich history of psychological assessment dating to at least Florence Goodenough’s Draw-A-Man Test of 1926. Numerous surveys of psychological practitioners have documented that various iterations of these measures have enjoyed widespread popularity to this day for assessing children’s intelligence and child and adult psychopathology (Lilienfeld et al. 2000). Other widely used and cited examples of the basic technique include Machover’s (1949) scoring system for human figure drawings, the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test (1963), Koppitz “emotional indicators” scoring system for children’s human figure drawings, Naglieri’s (1988) Draw-A-Person: A Quantitative Scoring System (DAP:QSS), and Reynolds and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abell, S. C., Von Briessen, P. D., & Watz, L. S. (1991). Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: An empirical investigation of two methods. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52(1), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. C., Wood, W., & Leibman, S. J. (2001). Children’s human figure drawings as measures of intelligence: The comparative validity of three scoring systems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19(3), 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikman, K. G., Belter, R. W., & Finch, A. J. (1992). Human figure drawings: Validity in assessing intellectual level and academic achievement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(1), 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. B., & Goodenough, F. L. (1963). Goodenough-Harris drawing test. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imuta, K., Scarf, D., Pharo, H., & Hayne, H. (2013). Drawing a close to the use of human figure drawings as a measure of intelligence. PloS One, 8(3), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamphaus, R. W., & Pleiss, K. L. (1991). Draw-A-Person techniques: Tests in search of a construct. Journal of School Psychology, 29(4), 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection: In the drawing of a human figure. Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (1988). Draw a person: A quantitative scoring system. San Antonio: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, G., & Hyland, P. (2001). Generalisability and classical test theory analyses of Koppitz’s scoring system for human figure drawings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., & Hickman, J. A. (2004). Draw-A-Person intellectual ability test for children, adolescents, and adults. Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcock, E., Imuta, K., & Hayne, H. (2011). Children’s human figure drawings do not measure intellectual ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. W. Kamphaus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kamphaus, R.W., Kurtz-Nelson, E. (2017). Draw-a-Person Tests. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_892-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_892-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics