Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Emotional Expressivity Scale

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_812-1

Synonyms

Definition

A 17-item self-report measure of emotional expressiveness.

Introduction

The self-report Emotional Expressivity Scale (EES) was developed and validated by Kring et al. (1994). The emotional expressiveness assessed via this scale is conceptualized as outward display of emotion in general, regardless of the content of emotion and the way it expressed (i.e., verbal or facial). Based on the general construct of emotional expressiveness, the EES aims to assess the extent of expressed emotions across diversified channels. The EES is a 17-item checklist rated by a 6-point Likert scale, with higher score indicating higher level of emotional expression.

Psychometric Properties

The EES was supposed to comprise a unifactorial structure and was later supported by both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (Dobbs et al. 2007; Gross and John 1998) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (Dobbs et al. 2007). The EES...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Barr, L. K., Kahn, J. H., & Schneider, W. J. (2008). Individual differences in emotion expression: Hierarchical structure and relations with psychological distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(10), 1045–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benoit, M., Bouthillier, D., Moss, E., Rousseau, C., & Brunet, A. (2010). Emotion regulation strategies as mediators of the association between level of attachment security and PTSD symptoms following trauma in adulthood. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 23(1), 101–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, R. C.-k., Wang, Y., Li, H., Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, W., & Huang, J. (2010). A 2-stage factor analysis of the emotional expressivity scale in the Chinese context. Psychologia, 53(1), 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan, R. C.-k., Shi, C., Lui, S. S. Y., Ho, K. K. Y., Hung, K. S. Y., Lam, J. W. S., et al. (2015). Validation of the Chinese version of the clinical assessment interview for negative symptoms (CAINS): A preliminary report. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 7.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00007 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobbs, J. L., Sloan, D. M., & Karpinski, A. (2007). A psychometric investigation of two self-report measures of emotional expressivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity: Multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 864.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kring, A. M., Smith, D. A., & Neale, J. M. (1994). Individual differences in dispositional expressiveness: Development and validation of the emotional expressivity scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 934.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar, M. V. (2015). Emotional expressivity, loneliness and subjective happiness as predictors of psychological wellbeing among the elderly. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 6(12), 1169.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, S., & Lee, H. (1997). The research on the validation of the trait meta-mood scale: The domain exploration of the emotional intelligence. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 11(1), 95–116.Google Scholar
  11. Marx, B. P., & Sloan, D. M. (2002). The role of emotion in the psychological functioning of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Behavior Therapy, 33(4), 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Piemontesi, S. E. (2012). The emotional expressivity scale validation in Argentine university students. Suma Psicológica, 19(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  13. Wang, Y., Neumann, D., Shum, D. H.-k., & Chan, R. C.-k. (2012). A cross-validation study of clustering of schizotypy using a non-clinical Chinese sample. Psychiatry Research, 200(1), 55–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhuo-ya Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jia Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raymond C.K. Chan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Neuropsychology and Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental HealthInstitute of PsychologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Section editors and affiliations

  • Patrizia Velotti
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly