Skip to main content

Handedness

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 57 Accesses

Definition

In daily life, human’s right and left hands often work in union. However, for some tasks, individuals show a preference for a dominant hand, such as for printing and writing. Some may prefer to use left hand, some may prefer right hand, and others may not show any preference for any hand. This individual difference in preference for using a hand is handedness. Handedness is not a categorical variable, but a continuum ranging from strong left to strong right (Annett 2002). In most cases, we typically have three different types of handedness, namely right-handedness, left-handedness, and mixed-handedness. Among the total population, right-handedness predominates, whereas left-handedness makes up only for around 10%. In addition, it has been revealed that men have a larger proportion of left-handedness than women, with an odds ratio being 1.23 (Papadatou-Pastou et al. 2008; Vuoksimaa and Kaprio 2010).

Origin

Three major accounts have been established for the individual...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annett, M. (2002). Handedness and brain asymmetry: The right shift theory. East Sussex: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, P. (1971). Handedness and birth order. Nature, 229, 195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, L., & McKeever, W. (2004). A large-scale study of handedness and pregnancy/birth risk events: Implications for genetic theories of handedness. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 9(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, R., & Rogers, L. J. (1999). Hand preference of the Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): Problem solving and responses in a novel setting. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Brown, T. J. (2006). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology, 20(3), 336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driesen, N. R., & Raz, N. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness on corpus callosum morphology: A meta-analysis. Psychobiology, 23(3), 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • HarmonJones, E. (2006). Unilateral right-hand contractions cause contralateral alpha power suppression and approach motivational affective experience. Psychophysiology, 43(6), 598–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, R. A., Bautista, J., & Hicks, G. J. (1999). Handedness and the vividness of dreams. Dreaming, 9(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. V., & Martin, M. (2000). A note on Corballis (1997) and the genetics and evolution of handedness: Developing a unified distributional model from the sex-chromosomes gene hypothesis. Psychological Review, 107(1), 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Josse, G., Seghier, M. L., Kherif, F., & Price, C. J. (2008). Explaining function with anatomy: Language lateralization and corpus callosum size. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(52), 14132–14139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Christman, S. D. (2009). Inconsistent handedness is linked to more successful foreign language vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 480–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kita, S., & Essegbey, J. (2001). Pointing left in Ghana: How a taboo on the use of the left hand influences gestural practice. Gesture, 1(1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. T. (1983). The distribution of left and right handedness in Chinese people [in Chinese]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 15(3), 268–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luders, E., Cherbuin, N., Thompson, P. M., Gutman, B., Anstey, K. J., Sachdev, P., & Toga, A. W. (2010). When more is less: Associations between corpus callosum size and handedness lateralization. NeuroImage, 52(1), 43–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, K. B., Logan, J. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 515–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, I. C., & Bryden, M. P. (1992). The genetics of handedness, cerebral dominance and lateralization. In I. Rapin & S. J. Segalowitz (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Child neuropsychology, Vol. 6, pp. 115–142). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S., Malaia, E., & Seo, R. (2014). Does degree of handedness in a group of right-handed individuals affect language comprehension? Brain and Cognition, 86, 98–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Niebauer, C. L. (2004). Handedness and the fringe of consciousness: Strong handers ruminate while mixed handers self-reflect. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(4), 730–745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papadatou-Pastou, M., Martin, M., Munafo, M. R., & Jones, G. V. (2008). Sex differences in left-handedness: A meta-analysis of 144 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(5), 677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A., & Dagnall, N. (2010). Effects of handedness and saccadic bilateral eye movements on components of autobiographical recollection. Brain and Cognition, 73(2), 93–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Propper, R. E., Christman, S. D., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2005). A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 751–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satz, P. (1972). Pathological left-handedness: An explanaory model. Cortex, 8(2), 121–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schredl, M., Beaton, A. A., Henley-Einion, J., & Blagrove, M. (2013). Handedness and dream-recall frequency. Dreaming, 23(2), 156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shobe, E. R., Ross, N. M., & Fleck, J. I. (2009). Influence of handedness and bilateral eye movements on creativity. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 204–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vuoksimaa, E., & Kaprio, J. (2010). Sex differences in left-handedness are also evident in Scandinavia and in twins: Comment on Papadatou-Pastou, Martin, Munafò, and Jones (2008). Psychological Bulletin. doi:10.1037/a0018972.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witelson, S. F. (1989). Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. Brain, 112(3), 799–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L., Hardie, S., & Rodway, P. (2004). Pause before you respond: Handedness influences response style on the Tower of Hanoi Task. Laterality, 9(2), 133–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L., Hardie, S. M., & Wilson, K. (2009). Handedness and behavioural inhibition: Left-handed females show most inhibition as measured by BIS/BAS self-report. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Q., Zhang, Q., Jin, S., Chen, J., Han, Y., & Cao, H. (2016). The relationship between implicit and explicit self-esteem: The moderating effect of handedness. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quanlei Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Yu, Q., Guo, Y. (2017). Handedness. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_758-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_758-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics