Skip to main content

Economics and Well-Being

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 134 Accesses

Definition

Economics and well-being is the study and measurement of welfare at both the individual and societal level. Traditionally, economists have measured well-being indirectly, by observing the choices people make in markets. More recently, as a result of advances in behavioral economics and availability of data, economists are measuring people’s preferences as expressed in subjective surveys.

Introduction

The economic analysis of well-being has been criticized for focusing too narrowly on material well-being. Although economists have always recognized that happiness (a term used interchangeably with utility, satisfaction, welfare, and well-being) is not solely derived from being financially well-off, the inherent difficulty of measuring well-being and theoretical results that rationalize money-metric measures of utility led to the use of income measures as substitutes for well-being in economic analysis. Recent advances in behavioral economics and in the measurement of well-being...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Two happiness puzzles. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys on happiness. American Economic Review, 91, 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the huma lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A., Angelescu McVey, L., Malgorzata, S., Sawangfa, O., & Smith Zweig, J. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22463–22468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J., & Oswald, A. (2001) Does Money buy happiness? Some evidence from windfalls. (unpublished paper). University of Warwick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2011). The pursuit of happiness: An economy of well-being. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does economic crisis reduce support for markets and democracy in Latin America? Journal of Latin American Studies, 36, 349–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., Eggers, A., & Sukhtankar, S. (2004). Does happiness pay? An initial exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 55, 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? (NBER Working Paper No. 8872). Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T. (2012). Parenthood and happiness: A review of folk theories versus empirical evidence. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 29–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 107(38), 16489–16493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behavior. Economica, 5(17), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1948). Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica, 15(60), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox (NBER Working Paper No 14282). Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 190–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 581–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E., Sen A., & Fitoussi J.P. (2009). Report of the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (CMEPSP) Available at http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/documents.htm

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Brou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Brou, D. (2016). Economics and Well-Being. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_747-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_747-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics