Definition and Introduction
Symbolic interactionism (SI) is an American sociological theoretical framework and research tradition that focuses on small-scale interactions between individuals. SI emphasizes the microprocesses through which individuals construct meaning, identity, and collective actions. As a scholarly tradition, SI asserts that meaning is not inherent and is rather constructed through multiple interactions in certain times and contexts. The symbolic interactionist framework posits that aspects of the surrounding social world – objects, ideas, events, people, etc. – impact and change humans, and humans in turn assign meaning to these interactions in order to determine how to act when in those specific environments, confronted with particular stimuli, or encountering distinctive properties of the social world. This framework focuses on explaining how (1) humans act and...
References
Adam, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918–925.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Cook, K. S., Fine, G. A., & House, J. S. (1995). Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). The looking-glass self. O’Brien, pp. 126–128.
Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 18(2), 121–144.
Fine, G. A. (1983). Shared fantasies: Role-playing games as social worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
House, J. S. (1977). The three faces of social psychology. Sociometry, 40, 161–177.
Manis, J. G., & Meltzer, B. N. (1967). Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Merton, R. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 191–216.
Roe, J., Joseph, S., & Middleton, H. (2010). Symbolic interaction: A theoretical approach to understanding stigma and recovery. Mental Health Review Journal, 15(1), 29–36.
Schellenberg, J. A. (1990). William James and symbolic interactionism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(4), 769–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290164016.
Smith-Lovin, L. (2007). The strength of weak identities: Social structural sources, situation, and emotional experience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(2), 106–124.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings.
Tedeschi, J. T. (Ed.). (2013). Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic.
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. T. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Franzese, A., Seigler, C. (2018). Symbolic Interactionism. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2125-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2125-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences