Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

The Role of Peers in Personality Development

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1931-1

Definition

Peers, or a group of people who have similar interests, age, background, or social status, serve as an important source of information, feedback, and support to individuals as they develop a sense of self. Peers help socialize an individual by reinforcing or punishing behaviors or interpersonal interactions. Peers are essential throughout one’s social development, but research suggests this is particularly true during adolescence.

Introduction

While most research suggests that family is the most influential in personality development (Hutteman et al. 2014), the role of peers can be highly influential, particularly in childhood and adolescence.

Socialization is the process by which an individual acquires the behavioral and social skills needed and learns the social norms of his or her culture, in order to become a functioning and accepted member of the group. However, the process of socialization not only teaches appropriate behaviors within a group but can also influence how...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Alberts, A., Elkind, D., & Ginsberg, S. (2007). The personal fable and risk-taking in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(1), 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Back, M.D., Baumert, A., Denissen, J. J., Hartung, F.M., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., & Wrzus, C. (2011). PERSOC: a united framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25(2), 90–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellmore, A. D., Nishinia, A., Witkow, M. R., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2007). The influence of classroom ethnic composition on same- and other- ethnicity peer nominations in middle school. Social Development, 16(4), 720–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clausen, J. A. (Ed.). (1968). Socialization and society. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  5. Cooley, C. H. (1902). The looking-glass self. New York: Seribner’s (pp. 179–185).Google Scholar
  6. Dumas, T., & Wolfe, D. (2012). Identity development as a buffer of adolescent risk behaviors in the context of peer group pressure and control. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 917–927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Elkind, D. (1967). Piaget’s conservation problems. Child Development, 38(4), 15–27.Google Scholar
  8. Ford, D. H., & Urban, H. B. (1963). Systems of psychotherapy: A comparative study. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & sons.Google Scholar
  9. Gavin, L. A., & Furman, W. (1989). Age differences in adolescents’ perceptions of their peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonzales, N. (2010). Family and peer influences on adolescent behavior and risk-taking (PDF). Retrieved 28 Nov 2010.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102(3), 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutteman, R., Hennecke, M., Orth, U., Reitz, A. K., & Specht, J. (2014). Developmental tasks as a framework to study personality development in adulthood and old age. European Journal of Personality, 28(3), 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kawabata, Y., & Crick, N. R. (2011). The significance of cross-racial/ethnic friendships: Associations with peer victimization, peer support, sociometric status, and classroom diversity. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1763–1775.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025399. PMID 21910536.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead, Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Reitz, A. K., Zimmermann, J., Hutteman, R., Specht, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2014). How peers make a difference: The role of peer groups and peer relationships in personality development. European Journal of Personality, 28(3), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Siegler, R. (2006). How children develop, exploring child develop student media tool kit & scientific American reader to accompany how children develop. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Tarrant, M. (2002). Adolescent peer groups and social identity. Social Development, 11(1), 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tudge, J. R., & Winterhoff, P.A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive Development. Human Development, 36(2), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Uzezi, J. G., & Deya, G. D. (2017). Relationship between peer group influence and students’ academic achievement in chemistry at secondary school level. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(4), 350–356.Google Scholar
  20. Yeung, K. T., & Martin, J. L. (2003). The looking glass self: An empirical test and elaboration. Social Forces, 81(3), 843–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National UniversityLa JollaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA