Skip to main content

Undoing (Defense Mechanism)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Definition

Undoing is the defense mechanism by which individuals avoid conscious awareness of disturbing impulses by thinking or acting in a way intended to revert (“make un-happen”) those impulses, even if only at a symbolic level.

Introduction

Undoing as a defense mechanism is accomplished by doing things that have the opposite meaning of the distressing impulses that the individual wants to be psychologically defended against. Examples include apologizing after being assertive or being nice to someone after having an aggressive thought against that same person. Through the use of undoing, individuals try to symbolically revert not only the consequences of an event but the event proper, as if it had never existed. In this regard, undoing has been linked to magical thinking (Baumeister et al. 1998). However, if undoing is “possible” to some degree in one’s mind, it can serve a defensive function by impeding a direct confrontation with the distressing impulses that were made to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albucher, R. C., Abelson, J. L., & Nesse, R. M. (1998). Defense mechanism changes in successfully treated patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 558–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Dale, K., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial. Journal of Personality, 66, 1081–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaya, C., Dornelles, M., Blaya, R., Kipper, L., Heldt, E., Isolan, L., et al. (2006). Do defense mechanisms vary according to the psychiatric disorder? Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 28, 179–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. (2004). Empirical studies of defense style. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12, 263–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1909/1959). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. IX, pp. 115–127). London: The Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenigsberg, H. W., Harvey, P. D., Mitropoulou, V., News, A. S., Goodman, M., Silverman, J., et al. (2001). Are the interpersonal and identity disturbances in the borderline personality disorder criteria linked to the traits of affective instability and impulsivity? Journal of Personality Disorders, 15, 358–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, A. (1983). On structure formation and the process of alteration. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 64, 333–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, C., & Andrews, G. (1989). Defense styles associated with specific anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 1500–1502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E. (1985). An empirically derived hierarchy of adaptive mechanisms and its usefulness as a potential diagnostic axis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum, 319(71), 171–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Miguel Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Costa, R.M. (2017). Undoing (Defense Mechanism). In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1434-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1434-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics