Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Dissociation (Defense Mechanism)

  • Rui Miguel Costa
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1375-1

Definition

When dissociation is used as a defense mechanism, the individual copes with acute emotional stress by changing the usual awareness of self, that is, by feeling detached from the usual sense of body (depersonalization) or surroundings (derealization), or by breaking the autobiographic continuity across time, which can lead to amnesias, or an unstable or divided sense of self (like different personalities in one body). In this process, stressors are put out of conscious awareness. Dissociation has been also defined as “lack of normal integration of thoughts, feelings, and experiences into the stream of consciousness and memory” (Bernstein and Putnam 1986, p. 727). As a maladaptive mechanism, the lack of awareness of the stressor impedes effective problem solving.

Introduction

Dissociation appears to be a personality trait ranging from common, mild, and transient states to chronic and pathological conditions (Ray et al. 1992) and might not necessarily be always a defense...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727–735.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blizard, R. A. (1997). The origins of dissociative identity disorder from an object relations and attachment theory perspective. Dissociation, 10, 223–229.Google Scholar
  3. Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1893/1955). On the psychical mechanisms of hysterical phenomena: preliminary communication. In J. Strachey, The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. II), pp. 3–17. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  4. Costa, R. M., Oliveira, T. F., Pestana, J., & Costa, D. (2016). Self-transcendence is related to higher female sexual responsiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giesbrecht, T., Geraerts, E., & Merckelbach, H. (2007). Dissociation, memory commission errors, and heightened autonomic reactivity. Psychiatry Research, 150, 277–285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McNally, R. J., Clancy, S. A., Schacter, D. L., & Pitman, R. K. (2000). Personality profiles, dissociation, and absorption in women reporting repressed, recovered, or continuous memories of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1033–1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ray, W. J., June, K., Turaj, K., & Lundy, K. (1992). Dissociative experiences in a college age population: a factor analytic study of two dissociation scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Saucier, G., & Skraypinska, K. (2006). Spiritual but not religious? Evidence for two opposite dispositions. Journal of Personality, 74, 1257–1292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schore, A. N. (2009). Relational trauma and the developing right brain: an interface of psychoanalytic self psychology and neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1159, 189–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. van der Kruijs, S. J., Bodde, N. M., Carrette, E., Lazeron, R. H., Vonck, R. E., Boon, P. A., Langereis, G. R., Cluitman, P. J., Feijs, L. M., Hofman, P. A., Backes, W. J., & Aldenkamp, A. P. (2014). Neurophysiological correlates of dissociative symptoms. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 85, 174–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WJCR – William James Center for Research, ISPA – Instituto UniversitárioLisbonPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Simon Boag
    • 1
  1. 1.MacQuarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia