Skip to main content

Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 105 Accesses

Synonyms

Qualitative methods; Think-aloud approach; Verbal protocol analysis

Definition

Articulated thoughts in a simulated situation (ATSS) is a qualitative experimental paradigm used for exploring cognition during complex situations.

Introduction

The ATSS paradigm was originally proposed by Davison et al. (1983). Davison et al. (1983) developed the ATSS method after identifying the need for an experimental paradigm that:

[Would] permit open-ended verbal responding that reflects, as much as possible, ongoing thought processes rather than retrospective reporting; subjects should be constrained as little as possible in what they report, and they should be enabled to make their reports with ease and a minimum of delay. The experimenter should also be able to specify and manipulate the situations to which subjects are responding, while at the same time being able to present events that are sufficiently realistic and complex. Next, situations unlikely to be bothersome to subjects should be...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. C., Robins, C., & Johnson, M. (1983). Articulated thoughts during simulated situations: A paradigm for studying cognition in emotion and behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. C., Vogel, R. S., & Coffman, S. G. (1997). Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(6), 950–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58 (5, Whole No. 270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, B. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1995). Verbal protocol analysis. The Psychologist, 8(3), 126–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Knafl, G. (2009). On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 208–222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tichener, E. B. (1896). An outline of psychology. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1920). Is thinking merely the action of language mechanisms? British Journal of Psychology, 11, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Fisher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fisher, P., Robie, C. (2017). Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1279-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1279-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics