Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Big-Five Model

  • John A. Johnson
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1212-1

Synonyms

Definition

The Big-Five Model (B5M) is a representation of the universe of personality traits in terms of five broad personality dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Intellect or Imagination. These five dimensions emerged reliably over decades of research factor-analyzing the way people describe each other with ordinary language traits such as aggressive, introverted, and sociable. The B5M is nearly identical to the Five-Factor Model (FFM), which emerged from research based on personality questionnaires. Although both the B5M and FFM have common roots in the research of Raymond Cattell and although the terms B5M and FFM are often used interchangeably today, the two models have distinctive histories, are based on different methods and theoretical assumptions, and hold slightly different conceptions of the factors, especially the fifth factor, labeled Openness to Experience in the FFM. The FFM...

Keywords

Personality Inventory Emotional Stability Ordinary Language Personality Questionnaire AB5C Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47 (Whole No. 211). doi:10.1037/h0093360.Google Scholar
  2. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215. doi:10.1037/00332909.117.2.187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506. doi:10.1037/h0054116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. New York: World Book Company. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146.Google Scholar
  5. Cattell, R. B. (1947). Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factors. Psychometrika, 12, 197–220. doi:10.1007/BF02289253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1976). Age differences in personality structure: A cluster analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 564–570. doi:10.1093/geronj/31.5.564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  8. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  9. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the big five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–20). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Digman, J. M., & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344. doi:10.1037/h0057198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldberg, L. R. (1971). A historical survey of personality scales and inventories. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 292–336). Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar
  18. Goldberg, L. R. (1980, Мау). Some ruminations about the structure of individual differences: Developing а common lexicon for the major characteristics of human personality. Symposium presentation at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Ноnolulu.Google Scholar
  19. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141–165). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 203–234). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of marker scales for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann Jr., W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146–163. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.1.146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hogan, R. (1986). Hogan personality inventory manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
  29. Hogan, R., & Foster, J. (2016). Rethinking personality. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 2, 37–43.Google Scholar
  30. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1992). Hogan personality inventory manual. Tulsa: Hogan Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
  31. Hogan, R., & Johnson, J. A. (1981, August). The structure of personality. Paper presented at the 89th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  32. John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203. doi:10.1002/per.2410020302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, J. A. (1994a). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C model. In B. De Raad & G. L. Van Heck (Eds.), The fifth of the big five [Special Issue]. European Journal of Personality, 8, 311–334. doi:10.1002/per.2410080408.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, J. A. (1994b). Multimethod replication of the AB5C model of personality traits. In B. De Raad, W. K. B. Hofstee, & G. L. M. Van Heck (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 5, pp. 42–49). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, J. A. (1997). Seven social performance scales for the California psychological inventory. Human Performance, 10, 1–30. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1001_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the five factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, J. A., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the five factor model with the Abridged big five-dimensional circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 563–576. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.65.3.563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaufman, S. B. (2015, August 31). The difference between ExtrAversion and ExtrOversion [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/the-difference-between-extraversion-and-extroversion/#
  39. McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329–361. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. McCrae, R. R. (1990). Traits and trait names: How well is openness represented in natural languages? European Journal of Personality, 4, 119–229. doi:10.1002/per.2410040205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1983). Joint factors in self-reports and ratings: Neuroticism, extraversion and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 245–255. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(83)90146-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1985). Updating Norman’s “adequate taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.Google Scholar
  43. McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586–595.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. McCrae, R. R., Costa Jr., P. T., & Piedmont, R. (1993). Folk concepts, natural language, and psychological constructs: The California psychological inventory and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 61, 1–26. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep9303190302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Muck, P. M., Hell, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2007). Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument: A self-peer study on the German adaptation of the ten-item personality inventory (TIPI-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 166–175. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the big one in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 66, 574–583. doi:10.1037/h0040291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norman, W. T. (1967). 2800 personality trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Ann Arbor: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan. ERIC Document Number xt/ED014738. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED014738
  50. Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552–567. doi:10.1037/00223514.57.3.552.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. de Raad, B., & Van Heck, G. L. (Eds.) (1994). The fifth of the big five [Special Issue]. European Journal of Personality, 8(4).Google Scholar
  52. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the big five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495–524. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2016). The next big five inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/pspp0000096. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  54. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961/1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61–97). Lackland Air Force Base: Aeronautical Systems Division, Personnel Laboratory. Reprinted as Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225–251. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00973.x.Google Scholar
  55. Wiggins, J. S. (Ed.). (1996). The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ashton Southard
    • 1
  1. 1.Oakland UniversityRochesterUSA