Skip to main content

Self-Protective Motives

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Definition

The motivation to defend oneself against negative self-views

Introduction

The self-protection motive is the motivation to defend oneself against negative self-views (for a review, see Alicke and Sedikides 2009). It is a form of self-evaluation motive that is related to avoidance motivation (i.e., the desire to avoid undesirable outcomes; see entry on “Avoidance Motivation”; Elliot and Mapes 2005). The self-protection motive is aimed at avoiding negativity in one’s self-views, as opposed to the self-enhancement motive, which aims at promoting positivity in one’s self-views (see entry on the “Self-Enhancement Motive”). People often engage in self-protective mechanisms to avoid falling below their subjective standards in a host of domains (e.g., moral conduct, academic standing, athletic ability). The self-protection motive is believed to be driven by the overarching desire to protect and maintain self-esteem and is activated when an event threatens one’s positive self-views....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agostinelli, G., Sherman, S. J., Presson, C. C., & Chain, L. (1992). Self-protection and self-enhancement biases in estimates of population prevalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 631–642. doi:10.1177/0146167292185014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48. doi:10.1080/10463280802613866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. M. (1981). Self-presentation styles. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research (pp. 311–333). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547–579. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, W. L., & Ashby, J. S. (2005). Multidimensional perfectionism and ego defenses. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 19, 41–54. doi:10.1300/J035v19n03_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Mapes, R. R. (2005). Approach-avoidance motivation and self-concept evaluation. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), Building, defending, and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 171–196). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. D., Pinter, B., & Sedikides, C. (2005). Mnemic neglect and self-threat: Trait modifiability moderates self-protection. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 225–235. doi:10.1002/ejsp.242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marigold, D. C., Holmes, J. G., & Ross, M. (2007). More than words: Reframing compliments from romantic partners fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 232–246. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., Griffin, D. W., Rose, P., & Bellavia, G. M. (2003). Calibrating the sociometer: The relational contingencies of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 63–84. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435–468. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, T. D., Skowronski, J. J., Wood, S. E., Walker, W. R., Vogl, R. J., & Gibbons, J. A. (2006). Event self-importance, event rehearsal, and the fading affect bias in autobiographical memory. Self and Identity, 5, 172–195. doi:10.1080/15298860600591222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T. R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 795–804. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C. (1999). A multiplicity of motives: The case of self-improvement. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 64–65. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1001_10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C. (2012). Self-protection. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 327–353). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2009). Memory as a self-protective mechanism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1055–1068. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00220.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., & Luke, M. (2007). On when self-enhancement and self-criticism function adaptively and maladaptively. In E. C. Chang (Ed.) (2008) Self-criticism and self-enhancement: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 181–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11624-011.

  • Skowronski, J. J. (2011). The positivity bias and the fading affect bias in autobiographical memory. In M. D. Alicke & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 211–231). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tice, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 711–725. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. N., Lennox, R. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1986). Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 356–361. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miranda Giacomin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada

About this entry

Cite this entry

Giacomin, M., Jordan, C.H. (2017). Self-Protective Motives. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1177-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1177-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics