Skip to main content

Reserve Capacity Model

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 128 Accesses

Synonyms

Cognitive-emotional reserves; Low psychosocial resources

Definition

A theoretical framework to understand how poverty, over time, contributes to disparities in health outcomes, focusing on the mechanisms of high stress, low reserves, and negative emotions.

Introduction

The Reserve Capacity Model (RCM) is a framework suggested by Gallo and Matthews (2003) to understand the mechanisms that underlie the well-established relationship between poverty/low socioeconomic status (SES) and poor health. The theory suggests that stress depletes the resources from which people can draw in times of need, and that over time low reserves elicit the experience of negative emotions. In turn, negative emotions affect physical health outcomes through poor health habits and chronic physiological arousal.

What Is the RCM?

The RCM proposes that people living with low SES experience more daily hassles and major life stressors than their middle and high SES counterparts. And, they have fewer...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, K. K., Buchanan, D. M., Jones, P., & Spertus, J. A. (2015). Socioeconomic status, cognitive-emotional factors, and health status following myocardial infarction: Testing the Reserve Capacity Model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(1), 110–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. C., & Matthews, K. A. (2003). Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: Do negative emotions play a role? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 10–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. C., Bogart, L. M., Vranceanu, A., & Matthews, K. A. (2005). Socioeconomic status, resources, psychological experiences, and emotional responses: A test of the Reserve Capacity Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 386–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. C., Espinosa de los Monteros, K., Ferrent, V., Urbina, J., & Talavera, G. (2007). Education, psychosocial resources, and metabolic syndrome variables in Latinas. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 14–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. C., Penedo, F. J., Espinosa de los Monteros, K., & Arguelles, W. (2009). Resiliency in the face of disadvantage: Do Hispanic cultural characteristics protect health outcomes? Journal of Personality, 77(6), 1707–1746.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. C., Fortmann, A. L., Roesch, S. C., Barrett-Connor, E., Elder, J. P., Espinosa de los Monteros, K., Shivpuri, S., Mills, P. J., Talavera, G. A., & Matthews, K. A. (2012). Socioeconomic status, psychosocial resources and risk, and cardiometabolic risk in Mexican American women. Health Psychology, 31, 334–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howarter, A. D., & Bennett, K. K. (2013). Perceived discrimination and health-related quality of life: Testing the Reserve Capacity Model in Hispanic Americans. Journal of Social Psychology, 153(1), 62–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, K. A., Raikkonen, K., Gallo, L., & Kuller, L. H. (2008). Association between socioeconomic status and metabolic syndrome in women: Testing the Reserve Capacity Model. Health Psychology, 27, 576–583.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kymberly Bennett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bennett, K. (2017). Reserve Capacity Model. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1154-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1154-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics