Definition
Based on Janet’s classic notion of dissociation, Hilgard (1977) proposed a neodissociation theory of hypnosis, the core concept of which was the division of consciousness into parallel, coexisting streams. Stemming from this theory, there are currently multiple alternative accounts of how dissociation may explain hypnotic phenomena.
Introduction
The concept of désagrégration, or dissociation, originated with Janet (1907), in his attempt to describe and explain various phenomena that appear to have a suggestive basis, such as hypnosis and some mental disorders. He proposed that a set of mental contents can become split off, or disassociated, from other mental processes and thus separated from awareness and voluntary control. Moreover, these dissociated contents may then be activated, outside of awareness, through suggestion.
Developing these ideas, Hilgard (1977) hypothesized that in hypnosis, an amnesia-like barriercan block some mental activity from the conscious access...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Bowers, K. S. (1992). Imagination and dissociation in hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 253–275.
Hilgard, E. R. (1977). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action. New York: Wiley.
Jamieson, G. A., & Woody, E. Z. (2007). Dissociated control as a paradigm for cognitive-neuroscience research and theorising in hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive-neuroscience perspective (pp. 111–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Janet, P. (1907). The major symptoms of hysteria. New York: Macmillan.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1992). Hypnosis: A sesquicentennial essay. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 50, 301–314.
Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1998). Dissociation theories of hypnosis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 100–115.
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.
Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2015). Dissociative subtypes in posttraumatic stress disorders and hypnosis: Neurocognitive parallels and clinical implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 452–457.
Woody, E. Z., & Bowers, K. S. (1994). A frontal assault on dissociated control. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 52–79). New York: Guilford Press.
Woody, E., & Sadler, P. (1998). On reintegrating dissociated theories: Comment on Kirsch and Lynn (1998). Psychological Bulletin, 123, 192–197.
Woody, E. Z., & Sadler, P. (2008). Dissociation theories of hypnosis. In M. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), Oxford handbook of hypnosis: Theory, research and practice (pp. 81–110). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sadler, P., Woody, E. (2017). Neodissociation Theory. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1143-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1143-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences