Definition
Radical behaviorism is the philosophy of science that serves as the conceptual foundation of modern behaviorism, including the experimental analysis of behavior, applied behavior analysis, and some areas of behavioral psychology.
Introduction
Considered as the philosophy undergirding the science of human behavior, radical behaviorism traces its roots to the work of B.F. Skinner (1904–1990) over the mid to late twentieth century. The foundation of this philosophical tradition maintains that questions concerning the complexity of the human experience can be better understood through the study of behavior. The primary assertion of radical behaviorism posits that the causes of behavior can be uncovered using the same methodologies and rigor as other natural sciences, such as biology and chemistry. Through this lens, predictions regarding human behavior can be empirically tested using...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Catania, A. C. (2013). A natural science of behavior. Review of General Psychology, Vol 17(2), 133–139.
Cooper, J., Heron, T., & Heward, W. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639–665.
Fletcher, L., & Hayes, S. C. (2006). Relational frame theory, acceptance and commitment therapy, and a functional analytic definition of mindfulness. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23, 315–336.
Miller, L. K. (2007). Principles of everyday behavior analysis (4th ed.). Belmont: Cengage.
Moore, J. (1989). Why methodological behaviorism is mentalistic. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 9(2), 20–27.
Moore, J. (1999). Conceptual foundations of radical behaviorism, The Cambridge Center-Sloan series in behavior analysis (pp. 1–11). Cornwall-on-Hudson: Sloan Pub.
Moore, J. (2003). Behaviorism, mentalism, and the path to social justice. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 181–193.
Moore, J. (2009). Why the radical behaviorist conception of private events is interesting, relevant, and important. Behavior and Philosophy, 37, 21–37.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books.
Skinner, B.F. (1984). [edited by A. C. Catania & S. Harnad, with numerous commentators] reprinted in book form under the title, The selection of consequences: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences (Vol. 7, pp. 473–724). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1989). Recent issues in the analysis of behavior. Columbus: Merrill Pub. Co.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lundy, P., Moore, J.W., Bishop, K. (2020). Radical Behaviorism. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_995
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_995
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24610-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24612-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences