Skip to main content

Hypersensitive Agency Detection

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 22 Accesses

Synonyms

Hyperactive agency detection; Intentionality bias

Definition

Hypersensitive agency detection (HAD) is the tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it does not exist or is unlikely to exist (Barrett 2004).

Introduction

Research has shown that people commonly interpret the movement of two-dimensional geometric shapes as being intentional and agentic. For example, in a classic study by Heider and Simmel (1944), participants were asked to view an animation in which three shapes (a large triangle, a small triangle, and a small circle) moved around a screen and in and out of an opening and closing rectangular box. Heider and Simmel found that the majority of participants described the movement of shapes as they would describe the intentional and goal-directed behavior of animals and humans. Participants also often created a story about the shapes (e.g., a person chasing another person), the emotions they experienced (e.g., fear, frustration), and their personal...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrett, J. L. (2004). Finding agents everywhere. In Why would anyone believe in god? Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. L. (2007). Is the spell really broken? Bio-psychological explanations of religion and theistic belief. Theology and Science, 5, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning, 22, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, D. (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, E. (2008). It’s no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen M. Douglas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Douglas, K.M. (2020). Hypersensitive Agency Detection. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_2273

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics