Definition
Integrative complexity (IC) refers to the structure of information processing, independently of its content. It entails two aspects: differentiation and integration, where differentiation refers to the extent of perceiving a variety of dimensions and perspectives when considering an issue, whereas integration is a capacity to create conceptual connections among these different dimensions and perspectives.
Introduction
IC is unique among cognitive complexity formulations in that it does not only consider the amount of different information, perspectives, or dimensions noticed and processed regarding one issue (differentiation) but also incorporates perceiving the connections among these divergent dimensions (integration). These recognized connections may be interactions, trade-offs,...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E. J., Bluck, S., De Vries, B., Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1990). Coding manual for conceptual/integrative complexity. Berkeley: University of British Columbia and University of California.
Conway, L. G., III, Conway, K. R., Gornick, L. J., & Houck, S. C. (2014). Automated integrative complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 603–624.
Coren, S., & Suedfeld, P. (1995). Personality correlates of conceptual complexity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 229–242.
De Vries, B., Blando, J., & Walker, L. J. (1995). The review of life’s events: Analyses of content and structure. In B. Haight & J. Webster (Eds.), The art and science of reminiscing: Theory, research, methods, and applications (pp. 123–137). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Gruenfeld, D. H., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Sociocognition in work groups: The evolution of group integrative complexity and its relation to task performance. Small Group Research, 24, 383–405.
Pratt, M. W., Pancer, M., Hunsberger, B., & Manchester, J. (1990). Reasoning about the self and relationships in maturity: An integrative complexity analysis of individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 575–581.
Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing: Individuals and groups functioning in complex social situations. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
Suedfeld, P. (1985). APA presidential addresses: The relation of integrative complexity to historical, professional, and personal factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1643.
Suedfeld, P. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: Archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1669–1702.
Suedfeld, P., & Bluck, S. (1993). Changes in integrative complexity accompanying significant life events: Historical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 124.
Suedfeld, P., & Coren, S. (1992). Cognitive correlates of conceptual complexity. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1193–1199.
Suedfeld, P., & Granatstein, J. L. (1995). Leader complexity in personal and professional crises: Concurrent and retrospective information processing. Political Psychology, 16, 509–522.
Suedfeld, P., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Health outcomes and cognitive aspects of recalled negative life events. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59, 172–177.
Suedfeld, P., & Piedrahita, L. E. (1984). Intimations of mortality: Integrative simplification as a precursor of death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 848.
Suedfeld, P., & Rank, A. D. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 169–178.
Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 427–441.
Suedfeld, P., Fell, C., & Krell, R. (1998). Structural aspects of survivor’s thinking about the holocaust. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11(2), 323–336.
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227–236.
Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819–827.
Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 388–398.
Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., & Berry, J. M. (1993). Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 500–511.
Young, M. D., & Hermann, M. G. (2014). Increased complexity has its benefits. Political Psychology, 35(5), 635–645.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Békés, V., Suedfeld, P. (2020). Integrative Complexity. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1942
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1942
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24610-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24612-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences