Synonyms
Definition
Broadly speaking, goals are desired end states that direct cognition and behavior in a goal-congruent manner. Goals can vary from the abstract to the concrete and may be approach-oriented (i.e., focused and achieving positive outcomes) or avoidance-oriented (i.e., focused on avoiding negative outcomes). Social goals are a subset of the goals human pursue that are interpersonal in nature, for example, making friends, finding a romantic partner, and making a favorable first impression.
Introduction
Humans pursue a wide range of goals. These sought after end states vary from the quotidian (e.g., waking up on time to catch the train) to the lofty (e.g., climbing Mount Hood) and may be specific (e.g., avoiding the flu) or abstract (e.g., attaining happiness). Goal pursuit can sometimes be focused on achieved desired end states, satisfying what are known as approach-orientedgoals. However, at other times goals are oriented toward...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., Brown, C. M., Sacco, D. F., & Claypool, H. M. (2008). Adaptive responses to social exclusion: Social rejection improves detection of real and fake smiles. Psychological Science, 19, 981–983.
Brown, W. M., & Moore, C. (2002). Smile asymmetries and reputation as reliable indicators of likelihood to cooperate: An evolutionary analysis. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 11, pp. 59–78). Huntington: Nova Science Publishers.
Brown, C. M., Young, S. G., Sacco, D. F., Bernstein, M. J., & Claypool, H. M. (2009). Social inclusion facilitates interest in mating. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 11–27.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioural inhibition, Behavioural activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
Chulef, A. S., Read, S. J., & Walsh, D. A. (2001). A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 191–232.
Correll, J., & Park, B. (2005). A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(4), 341–359.
Eisenberger, N. A., Lierberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441.
Feldman, R. S., Forrest, J. A., & Happ, B. R. (2002). Self-presentation and verbal deception: Do self-presenters lie more?. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(2), 163–170.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152–177.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
Gray, J. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In J. Strelau & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement. Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 105–128). New York: Plenum.
Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. Psychological perspectives on the self, 1(1), 231–262.
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Griskevicius, V., Becker, D. V., & Schaller, M. (2010). Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior: The fundamental motives framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 63–67.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological bulletin, 107(1), 34–47.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.
Leary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. A., & Schreindorfer, L. S. (2013). Construct validity of the need to belong scale: Mapping the nomological net. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 610–624.
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., Grob, A., Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452–512.
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T., Hofer, B., Delton, A., Butner, J., & Schaller, M. (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 63–78.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality (pp. 531–545). New York: Oxford University Press.
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., & Schaller, M. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease-avoidance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1042–1051.
Parkinson, B. (2005). Do facial movements express emotions or communicate motives? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 278–311.
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.)., The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying The social monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity to social cues and information as an adaptive response to social exclusion and belonging need (pp. 213–226). New York: Psychology Press.
Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1989). The importance of goals in personality: Toward a coherent model of persons. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Social intelligence and cognitive assessments of personality: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 163–174). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Shields, S. A. (1995). On the advantages of modesty: The benefits of a balanced self-presentation. Communication Research, 22(5), 575–591.
Rui, J., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic self-presentation online: A cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 110–118.
Sacco, D. F., Lustgraaf, C. N. J., Brown, M., & Young, S. G. (2015). Activation of self-protection threat increases women’s preferences for dominance in male faces. Human Ethology Bulletin, 30, 24–32.
Schaller, M., Park, J., & Faulkner, J. (2003). Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices. European review of social psychology, 14(1), 105–137.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–274.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036.
Winton, E. C., Clark, D. M., & Edelmann, R. J. (1995). Social anxiety, fear of negative evaluation and the detection of negative emotion in others. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 193–196.
Young, S. G., Slepian, M. L., & Sacco, D. F. (2015). Sensitivity to perceived facial trustworthiness is increased by activating self-protection motives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 607–613.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Young, S.G. (2020). Social Goals. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1832
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1832
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24610-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24612-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences