Introduction
In the course of the twentieth century, a range of guidelines and assumptions have developed regarding how best to assess cognitive (e.g., intellegence) and noncognitive (e.g., personality) individual differences. During that time, methods for the assessment of cognitive individual differences have diverged substantially from those for noncognitive individual differences, most notably personality and temperament. Yet early research by both Spearman (1904) and Webb (1915) used largely similar methods of data collection and analysis of cognitive and personality variables, respectively. Currently, cognitive measures are typically assessed using purposefully designed performance-based measures assessed by an independent observer, while personality assessments commonly rely upon self-assessments of accuracy of description or behavioral frequency.
The use of performance versus report-based measures is dealt with elsewhere – this entry instead focuses upon the use of...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ackerman, P. L., & Wolman, S. D. (2007). Determinants and validity of self-estimates of abilities and self-concept measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 13(2), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.13.2.57.
Allik, J., Laidra, K., Realo, A., & Pullman, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18, 445–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.524.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Borgatta, E. F. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 9(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830090103.
Boring, E. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.546.
Bratko, D., Butkovic, A., Vukasovic, T., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & von Stumm, S. (2012). Cognitive ability, self-assessed intelligence and personality: Common genetic but independent environmental aetiologies. Intelligence, 40(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.001.
Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 258–299). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(4), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116.
Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1417576.
Cattell, R. B. (1984). The voyage of a laboratory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 121–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.1984.9676917.
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Harlaar, N., Greven, C. U., & Plomin, R. (2010). More than just IQ: A longitudinal examination of self-perceived abilities as predictors of academic performance in a large sample of UK twins. Intelligence, 38(4), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.002.
Connelly, B. S. (2008). The reliability, convergence, and predictive validity of personality ratings: An other perspective (Doctor of Philosophy Doctoral Dissertation). University of Minnesota.
Connelly, B. S., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2012). A narrower scope or a clearer lens for personality? Examining sources of observers’ advantages over self-reports for predicting performance. Journal of Personality, 80(3), 603–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00744.x.
Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy & predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212.
Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00371.x.
Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper.
De Fruyt, F., Bartels, M., Van Leeuwen, K. G., De Clercq, B., Decuyper, M., & Mervielde, I. (2006). Five types of personality continuity in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81(3), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.538.
De Pauw, S.S.W. (2012). How are temperament and personality related in children and adolescents from 1.5 to 15 years? Paper presented at the 16th European Conference on Personality, Trieste.
De Pauw, S. S. W., Mervielde, I., & Van Leeuwen, K. G. (2009). How are traits related to problem behavior in preschoolers? Similarities and contrasts between temperament and personality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9290-0.
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786.
Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (2004). Self-report questionnaires. In S. N. Haynes & E. M. Heiby (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment (Vol. 3). Hoboken: Wiley.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057198.
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgement: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102(4), 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652.
Gill, M. J., & Swann Jr., W. B. (2004). On what it means to know someone: a matter of pragmatics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.405.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1303.
Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child-personality data: Derivation of Big Five factor scores from each of six samples. Journal of Personality, 69(5), 709–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.695161.
Hofstee, W. K. B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality? European Journal of Personality, 8, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080302.
Ivancevich, J. M. (1976). Effects of goal-setting on performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 605–612.
John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement: The Big Five, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 521–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x.
Kenny, D. A., & West, T. V. (2010). Similarity and agreement in self-and other perception: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353414.
Kornilova, T. V., Kornilov, S. A., & Chumakova, M. A. (2009). Subjective evaluations of intelligence and academic self-concept predict academic achievement: Evidence from a selective student population. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.001.
Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the Big Five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.90.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 683–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291.
Oh, I.-S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 762–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021832.
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54.
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996.
Poropat, A. E. (2011). What a difference a rater makes: Rater-method variance and conscientiousness-work performance correlations. Paper presented at the Industrial-Organisational Psychology Conference, Brisbane.
Poropat, A. E. (2014a). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12019.
Poropat, A. E. (2014b). Other-rated personality and academic performance: Evidence and implications. Learning and Individual Differences, 34(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.013.
Poropat, A. E. (2016). Beyond the shadow: The role of personality and temperament in learning. In L. Corno & E. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 172–185). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Division 15 – Educational Psychology.
Pytlik Zillig, L. M., Hemenover, S. H., & Dienstbier, R. A. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait?: A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in Big 5 Personality Inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 847–858.
Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718.
Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.
Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. K. (1963). A comparison of the development of speech and reading behavior. Child Development, 33(4), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126893.
Taylor, P. J., Pajo, K., Cheung, G. W., & Stringfield, P. (2004). Dimensionality and validity of a structured telephone reference check procedure. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 745–772.
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Lackland Air Force Base: Personnel Laboratory, Aeronautical Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force.
Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970475.
Watson, D. (1989). Strangers’ ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.120.
Webb, E. (1915). Character and Intelligence: An Attempt at an exact study of character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Poropat, A.E., Cummings, D. (2020). Observer-Report Assessment of Personality and Individual Differences. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1336
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1336
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24610-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24612-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences