Skip to main content

Social Dominance Orientation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Definition

An individual difference variable tapping generalized support for group-based inequality and hierarchy.

Introduction

Following the carnage of WWII, social scientists became heavily invested in explaining intergroup relations (and prejudice in particular). One early influential approach involved the measurement and study of individual differences, especially authoritarianism (Adorno et al. 1950; Allport 1954). In brief, researchers established that some people, relative to others, are more likely to be ethnocentric in orientation and express prejudices toward a range of groups (e.g., Blacks, immigrants, Jews). Central to the concept of authoritarianism generally, and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA; Altemeyer 1996) in particular, was the recognition that some people are predisposed toward being (a) submissive and obedient toward authorities (e.g., church leaders, parents), (b) conventional and traditional (e.g., valuing customs and rituals), and (c) aggressive against those...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1951). Freudian theory and the pattern of fascist propaganda. In G. Roheim (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and the social sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 279–300). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2011). Social dominance-based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhont, K., & Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C.C. (2014a). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human-human and human-animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61–62, 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhont, K., Van Hiel, A., & Hewstone, M. (2014b). Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213497064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhont, K., Hodson, G., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human-animal relations model (SD-HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30, 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.83.1.75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, H., & Sidanius, J. (2005). Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G. (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X231109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., Rush, J., & MacInnis, C. C. (2010). A “joke is just a joke” (except when it isn’t): Cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 660–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., Choma, B. L., Boisvert, J., Hafer, C., MacInnis, C. C., & Costello, K. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., MacInnis, C. C., & Busseri, M. A. (2017). Bowing and kicking: Rediscovering the fundamental link between generalized authoritarianism and generalized prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2014). Is subjective ambivalence toward gays a modern form of bias? Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left of right? Sources of political orientation: The roots of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation. Psychology and Sexuality, 6, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.987684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, C.C., Busseri, M.A., Choma, B.L., & Hodson, G. (2013). The happy cyclist: Examining the association between generalized authoritarianism and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences,55,789–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.018.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, C. G., Harding, J. F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöβel, K., Kämpfe, N., & Riemann, R. (2006). The Jena twin registry and the Jena twin study of social attitudes (JeTSSA). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 783–786. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.9.6.783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon Hodson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hodson, G., Hoffarth, M.R. (2020). Social Dominance Orientation. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1183

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics