Definition
An individual difference variable tapping generalized support for group-based inequality and hierarchy.
Introduction
Following the carnage of WWII, social scientists became heavily invested in explaining intergroup relations (and prejudice in particular). One early influential approach involved the measurement and study of individual differences, especially authoritarianism (Adorno et al. 1950; Allport 1954). In brief, researchers established that some people, relative to others, are more likely to be ethnocentric in orientation and express prejudices toward a range of groups (e.g., Blacks, immigrants, Jews). Central to the concept of authoritarianism generally, and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA; Altemeyer 1996) in particular, was the recognition that some people are predisposed toward being (a) submissive and obedient toward authorities (e.g., church leaders, parents), (b) conventional and traditional (e.g., valuing customs and rituals), and (c) aggressive against those...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adorno, T. W. (1951). Freudian theory and the pattern of fascist propaganda. In G. Roheim (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and the social sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 279–300). New York: International Universities Press.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2.
Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.10.
Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2011). Social dominance-based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.769.
Dhont, K., & Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C.C. (2014a). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human-human and human-animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61–62, 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020.
Dhont, K., Van Hiel, A., & Hewstone, M. (2014b). Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213497064.
Dhont, K., Hodson, G., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human-animal relations model (SD-HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30, 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.83.1.75.
Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.526.
Haley, H., & Sidanius, J. (2005). Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051067.
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033.
Hodson, G. (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X231109.
Hodson, G. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409025.
Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01962.x.
Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005.
Hodson, G., Rush, J., & MacInnis, C. C. (2010). A “joke is just a joke” (except when it isn’t): Cavalier humor beliefs facilitate the expression of group dominance motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 660–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019627.
Hodson, G., Choma, B. L., Boisvert, J., Hafer, C., MacInnis, C. C., & Costello, K. (2013). The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.002.
Hodson, G., MacInnis, C. C., & Busseri, M. A. (2017). Bowing and kicking: Rediscovering the fundamental link between generalized authoritarianism and generalized prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.018.
Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2014). Is subjective ambivalence toward gays a modern form of bias? Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.014.
Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left of right? Sources of political orientation: The roots of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025560.
MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). Why are heterosexual men (vs. women) particularly prejudiced toward gay men? A social dominance theory explanation. Psychology and Sexuality, 6, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2014.987684.
MacInnis, C.C., Busseri, M.A., Choma, B.L., & Hodson, G. (2013). The happy cyclist: Examining the association between generalized authoritarianism and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences,55,789–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.018.
McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00765.x.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772.
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226.
Sibley, C. G., Harding, J. F., Perry, R., Asbrock, F., & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.750.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476.
Stöβel, K., Kämpfe, N., & Riemann, R. (2006). The Jena twin registry and the Jena twin study of social attitudes (JeTSSA). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 783–786. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.9.6.783.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hodson, G., Hoffarth, M.R. (2020). Social Dominance Orientation. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1183
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1183
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24610-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24612-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences