Skip to main content

(Managing) Diversity

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics

Synonyms

Dissimilarity; Heterogeneity

Definition

The division of the workforce into distinct categories that (a) have a perceived commonality within a given cultural or national context and that (b) impact potentially harmful or beneficial employment outcomes such as job opportunities, treatment in the workplace, and promotion prospects – irrespective of job-related skills and qualifications (Mor Barak 2014, p. 136).

Description

Organizations have become more diverse over the past decades, among others, due to globalization and women entering the labor force. The increasing reliance on teamwork and loosening of hierarchical boundaries have further created an increase in the extent to which individuals who differ from each other work together. Another main impetus for diversity in organizations was the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the USA, which prohibited all employment practices that discriminated on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin (age and disability were...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benschop Y, Verloo M (2011) Gender change, organizational change, and gender equality strategies. In: Jeanes EL, Knights D, Martin PY (eds) Handbook of gender, work, and organization. West Sussex, Wiley-Blackwell, pp 277–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwertmann DJ, Nishii LH, van Knippenberg D (2016) Disentangling the fairness & discrimination and synergy perspectives on diversity climate moving the field forward. J Manag 42(5):1136–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly AH (2016) When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance? J Soc Issues 72:199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Adm Sci Q 46(2):229–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham HD (1998) Unintended consequences: the convergence of affirmative action and immigration. Am Behav Sci 41:898–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E, Dobbin F (1998) How affirmative action became diversity management: employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961 to 1996. Am Behav Sci 41:960–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan T, Bezrukova K, Ely R, Jackson S, Joshi A, Jehn K, Leonard J, Levine D, Thomas D (2003) The effects of diversity on business performance: report of the diversity research network. Hum Resour Manag 42:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie LM, Mayer DM, Kravitz DA (2014) The stigma of affirmative action: a stereotyping-based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. Acad Manag J 57:964–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorbiecki A, Jack G (2000) Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management. Br J Manag 11:17–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyd DL, Wang C, Phillips K, Lount R (2013) Social category diversity promotes premeeting elaboration: the role of relationship focus. Organ Sci 24(3):757–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay PF, Avery DR (2015) Diversity climate in organizations: current wisdom and domains of uncertainty. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag 33:191–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak ME (2014) Managing diversity: toward a globally inclusive workplace, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak ME, Lizano EL, Kim A, Duan L, Rhee MK, Hsiao HY, Brimhall KC (2016) The promise of diversity management for climate of inclusion: a state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov 4:305–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii L (2013) The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Acad Manag J 56(6):1754–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii L, Mayer DM (2009) Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. J Appl Psychol 94:1412–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noon M (2007) The fatal flaws of diversity and the business case for ethnic minorities. Work Employ Soc 21:773–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendry LF, Driscoll DM, Field CT (2007) Diversity training: putting theory into practice. J Occup Organ Psychol 80:27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut VC (2010) Diversity science: why and how differences makes a difference. Psychol Inq 21:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pless MM, Maak T (2004) Building an inclusive diversity culture: principles, processes and practice. J Bus Ethics 54:129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pletzer JL, Nikolova R, Kedzior KK, Voelpel SC (2015) Does gender matter? Female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance – a meta-analysis. PLoS One 10(6):e0130005. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post C, Byron K (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: a meta-analysis. Acad Manag J 58(5):1546–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhode D, Packel AK (2014) Diversity on corporate boards: how much difference does difference make? Del J Corp Law (DJCL) 39(2):377–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore LM, Randel AE, Chung BG, Dean MA, Ehrhardt KH, Singh G (2011) Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research. J Manag 37:1262–1289

    Google Scholar 

  • Srikanth K, Harvey S, Peterson R (2016) A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. Acad Manag Ann 10:453–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson F, Schwabenland C (2010) Reconciling competing discourses of diversity? The UK non-profit sector between social justice and the business case. Organization 17:101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, van Engen ML, van Knippenberg D (2012a) Defying conventional wisdom: a meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 119:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, van Engen ML, Paauwe J (2012b) Reframing the business case for diversity: a values and virtues perspective. J Bus Ethics 111:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H, van Engen ML, Meyer B, Loyd DL (2017) Microdynamics in diverse teams: A review and integration of the diversity and stereotyping literatures. Acad Manag Ann 11:517–557

    Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. J Appl Psychol 89:1008–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanoni P, Janssens M, Benschop Y, Nkomo S (2010) Unpacking diversity, grasping inequality: rethinking difference through critical perspectives. Organization 17:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans van Dijk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

van Dijk, H. (2017). (Managing) Diversity. In: Poff, D., Michalos, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_52-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_52-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23514-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23514-1

  • eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics