Introduction
Although a frequently employed practice, little has been written on the ethics of boycotting. One article, The Business of Boycotting: Having Your Chicken and Eating It Too, by Alan Tomhave and Mark Vopat, explicitly addresses the issue (Tomhave and Vopat 2018). In their article, Tomhave and Vopat argue for the moral impermissibility of some, but by no means all, boycotts. In large part, Tomhave and Vopat are responding to the view of boycotts expressed by those like Murray Rothbard that boycotts are always per se morally acceptable, because they do not involve coercive force (Rothbard 1998). Unlike Rothbard, Tomhave and Vopat hold that the question of whether boycotts are coercive is not a settled issue. They claim that there are two initial questions that need to be answered, “First, are boycotts coercive? … Second, are there instances of boycotting that would fall into an unjust use of coercion” (Tomhave and Vopat 2018...
References
Mill JS (2010) On liberty. Penguin, London
Rothbard MN (1998) The ethics of liberty. New York University Press, New York/London
Tomhave A, Vopat M (2018) The business of boycotting: having your chicken and eating it too. J Bus Ethics 152(1):123–132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Vopat, M., Tomhave, A. (2020). Business of Boycotting. In: Poff, D., Michalos, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_1124-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_1124-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23514-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23514-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences