Skip to main content

Sexual Access as Benefit of Victory in War

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 44 Accesses

Synonyms

Females as the spoils of war; Sexual access as the reason for going to war; Sexual access during warfare

Definition

Warfare, defined as lethal coalitional violence, is a human universal and may be partially explained as a result of evolved psychological mechanisms in males for increased sexual access to females.

Introduction

J. M. G. van der Dennen described how, at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society (1993), Leda Cosmides posed the question “Why would anyone be so stupid as to initiate a war?” and then provided the answer: “To get women” (quoted in van der Dennen 1995, p. 327). Although this answer is often rejected out of hand by most social scientists, and modern scholars of war rarely consider sexual access as a motive for warfare, the notion that coalitional violence is waged by men to gain sexual access to women is far from new. Descriptions of success in war leading to increased sexual access to women are found in both ancient texts and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Camilleri, J. A. (2012). Evolutionary psychological perspectives on sexual offending: From etiology to intervention. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war (pp. 173–196). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2005). Aggression. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 628–652). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. A. (1997). Yanomamo (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D. P. (2009). The human potential for peace. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gat, A. (2006). War in human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall, J. (2004). Explaining wartime rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 41, 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Todd, M., & Finch, J. (1997). Interpersonal attraction from an evolutionary perspective: Women’s reactions to dominant and prosocial men. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 141–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (1996). War before civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L. H. (2014). War before civilization – 15 years on. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of violence (pp. 23–31). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Konner, M. (2015). Women after all: Sex, evolution and the end of male supremacy. New York: Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, P. M. (2012). War histories in evolutionary perspective: Insights from prehistoric North America. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war (pp. 324–338). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc, S. A. (2014). Warfare and human nature. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of violence (pp. 73–97). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, G. (1986). The origins of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, J. R., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes- Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war (pp. 3–22). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, C. D., & McDonald, M. M. (2014). Sexual selection and the psychology of intergroup conflict. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of violence (pp. 99–116). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. B. (2012). The evolutionary psychology of mass politics. In S. C. Roberts (Ed.), Applied evolutionary psychology (pp. 115–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2014). Fitness costs of warfare for women. Human Nature, 5(4), 476–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (2008). Intergroup prejudices and intergroup conflicts. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Foundations of evolutionary psychology (pp. 401–414). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2000). The natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report, 88, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turney-High, H. H. (1971). Primitive war: Its practice and concepts (2nd ed.). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Brooks, C. (2014). Adaptation and coherence: Evolutionary and dynamical perspectives on human violence. In The evolution of violence (pp. 187–209). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Dennen, J. M. G. (1995). The origin of war: The evolution of a male-coalitional reproductive strategy. Groningen: Origin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoof, J. A. R. A. M. (1990). Intergroup competition and conflict in animals and man. In J. van der Dennen & V. Falger (Eds.), Sociobiology and conflict: Evolutionary perspectives on competition, violence and warfare (pp. 23–54). London: Chapman and Hill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M. (2012). The male warrior hypothesis: The evolutionary psychology of intergroup conflict, tribal aggression, and warfare. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes- Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war (pp. 291–300). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Dietrich, E., & Clark, A. B. (2003). On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 669–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1999). Evolution of coalitional killing. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 42, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chet R. Savage or Craig T. Palmer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Savage, C.R., Palmer, C.T. (2016). Sexual Access as Benefit of Victory in War. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_965-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_965-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics