Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Same-Sex Coalitions That Exclude Women

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_956-1

Synonyms

Definition

Males show a preference for forming and maintaining large social groups composed of same-sex peers. This tendency is argued to be a mechanism for forming coalitions to engage in intergroup warfare.

Introduction

From a young age, males show a proclivity for forming large same-sex social groups. This is contrasted by the dyadic relationships generally preferred by females. One explanation for this preference among men to form large groups of same-sex peers is that it is an evolved mechanism for building and maintaining coalitions that function to protect the group from attack by outsiders and that can be used to attack outgroups. This entry will describe the evolutionary evidence for why such a mechanism should be restricted to men rather than women and review evidence from the literature providing support for the idea that these same-sex male coalitions serve the function of facilitating success...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Benenson, J. F. (1990). Gender differences in social networks. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 10(4), 472–495.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431690104004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nguyen, T., Bullock, G., & Wrangham, R. (2013). Social exclusion: More important to human females than males. PLoS One, 8(2).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benenson, J. & Wrangham, R. (2016). Cross-cultural sex differences in post-conflict affiliation following sports matches. Current Biology, 26(16):2208–2212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 3531–3535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browne, K. R. (2001). Women at war: An evolutionary perspective. Buffalo Law Review, 49, 51–247.Google Scholar
  7. Chagnon, N. A. (2013). Noble savages: My life among two dangerous tribes. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behaviour (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. Goldschmidt, W. (1988). The inducement to military conflict in tribal societies. In R. A. Rubinstein & M. L. Foster (Eds.), The Social Dynamics of Peace and Conflict: Culture in International Security (pp. 47–65). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Matthew, S., & Boyd, R. (2014). The cost of cowardice: Punitive sentiments towards free riders in Turkana raids. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 58–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1988). The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies Technical Report, 88, 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In: B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descentof man, (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  13. Van Vugt, M. (2012). The Male Warrior Hypothesis: The Evolutionary Psychology of Intergroup Conflict, Tribal Aggression, and Warfare. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.013.0017.
  14. Wrangham, R. W., & Glowacki, L. (2012). Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and war in nomadic hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 23, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Melissa M. McDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterUSA