Skip to main content

Reproduction

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 64 Accesses

Synonyms

Asexual reproduction; Sex; Sexual reproduction

Definitions

The process by which offspring are produced by their parents; in humans, reproduction is the combination of genetic material from two sexes, male and female, to produce offspring.

Introduction

While many of us may feel that we have a personal understanding of sex and reproduction, we rarely stop to consider how important the process of reproduction is to all life on earth. Reproduction is the method by which genetic material contained within an organism, whether it be within single-celled protozoa or in multicellular humans, is passed from one generation to the next. This movement of genetic material through generations is how evolution occurs; natural selection acts upon heritable differences between individuals and favors some genetic combinations over others. This makes how, when, where, and in many cases with whom you reproduce an especially significant question in evolutionary terms.

When we think about the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benatar, D., & Wasserman, D. (2015). Debating procreation: Is it wrong to reproduce? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(01), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: a role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological bulletin, 118(1), 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(04), 573–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R., & Tanese, R. (1990). Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87(9), 3566–3573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartfield, M., & Keightley, P. D. (2012). Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombination. Integrative Zoology, 7(2), 192–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Gildersleeve, K. (2011). Can men detect ovulation? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesketh, T., Lu, L., & Xing, Z. W. (2005). The effect of China’s one-child family policy after 25 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(11), 1171–1176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, M., Brook, C., & Conway, G. S. (2004). Androgen and psychosexual development: Core gender identity, sexual orientation, and recalled childhood gender role behavior in women and men with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, I. A. (2001). Minireview: Sex differentiation. Endocrinology, 142(8), 3281–3287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, I. A., Werner, R., Bunch, T., & Hiort, O. (2012). Androgen insensitivity syndrome. In Seminars in Reproductive Medicine (Vol. 30, No. 05, pp. 432–442). Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowiak, W. R., & Fischer, E. F. (1992). A cross-cultural perspective on romantic love. Ethnology, 31(2), 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown, A., & Brown, J. H. (1987). Anisogamy, sexual selection, and the evolution and maintenance of sex. Evolutionary Ecology, 1(2), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kondrashov, A. S. (1988). Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature, 336(6198), 435–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLaughlin, D. T., & Donahoe, P. K. (2004). Sex determination and differentiation. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(4), 367–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, H., & Abrams, P. A. (1999). Why are equally sized gametes so rare? The instability of isogamy and the cost of anisogamy. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1, 769–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemitz, E. L., & Feinberg, A. P. (2004). Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: A call for investigation. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 74(4), 599–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A., Baker, R. R., & Smith, V. G. F. (1972). The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 36(3), 529–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, C. H., Goy, R. W., Gerall, A. A., & Young, W. C. (1959). Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig 1. Endocrinology, 65(3), 369–382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Women’s sexual strategies: The evolution of long-term bonds and extrapair sex. Annual Review of Sex Research, 17(1), 59–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, R. J. (2008). Human pair-bonds: Evolutionary functions, ecological variation, and adaptive development. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 17(5), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. D., Henderson, G. E., Wang, T. F., Huang, Y. Y., Parish, W., Pan, S. M., … & Cohen, M. S. (2005). Surplus men, sex work, and the spread of HIV in China. AIDS, 19(6), 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayena, E., Rowe, P. J., & Griffin, P. D. (2002). Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction (pp. 15–21). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, R. (2015). The risk of a lifetime: How, when, and why procreation may be permissible. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, D., & Koopman, P. (2006). The makings of maleness: Towards an integrated view of male sexual development. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7(8), 620–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. A., & Davies, D. C. (2007). The control of sexual differentiation of the reproductive system and brain. Reproduction, 133(2), 331–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia Mitchell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mitchell, V. (2017). Reproduction. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_456-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_456-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics