Harris’ Moral Landscape
In Sam Harris’ (2010) book, The Moral Landscape, he argues that human values can be interpreted scientifically through the examination of what contributes to the well-being or suffering of conscious creatures.
Neuroscientist and philosopher Sam Harris argues in his book, The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values (2010), that a scientific approach to morality will be able to establish objective truths about what is right and wrong in terms of what causes conscious human and nonhuman animals to thrive or suffer. Because conscious beings are governed by the laws of nature and are responsible for conceptions of moral values, he proposes that morality can be construed and developed as a natural science. In Harris’ view, applying an empirical approach to morality is reasonable because “human well-being entirely depends on events in the world and on states of the human brain” (2010, p. 2). To...
KeywordsNonhuman Animal Behavior Analyst Behavior Change Technique Moral Fact Conscious Creature
- Blackford, R. (2010). Book review: Sam Harris’ The moral landscape [Review of the book The moral landscape, by S. Harris]. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 21, 53–62.Google Scholar
- Harris, S. (2010). The moral landscape: How science can determine moral values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Harris, S. (2011, January 29). A response to critics. The Huffington Post. Retrieved April 30, 2016, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-harris/a-response-to-critics_b_815742.html
- Horgan, J. (2010, October 11). Be wary of the righteous rationalist: We should reject Sam Harris’ claim that science can be a moral guidepost [Review of the book The moral landscape, by S. Harris]. The Scientific American. Retrieved April 30, 2016, from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/be-wary-of-the-righteous-rationalist-we-should-reject-sam-harriss-claim-that-science-can-be-a-moral-guidepost/
- Isaacson, S. (2012). Mining the moral landscape: Why science does not (and cannot) determine human values. Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
- Jollimore, T. (2010, October 22). Review: The moral landscape [Review of the book The moral landscape, by S. Harris]. Barnes and Noble Review. Retrieved April 30, 2016, from http://www.barnesandnoble.com/review/the-moral-landscape
- Nagel, T. (2010, October 20). The facts fetish [Review of the book The moral landscape, by S. Harris]. The New York Republic. Retrieved April 30, 2016, from https://newrepublic.com/article/78546/the-facts-fetish-morality-science
- Pigliucci, M. (2011). Science and the is/ought problems: A review of The moral landscape: How science can determine human values by Sam Harris [Review of the book The moral landscape, by S. Harris]. Skeptic, 16, 60.Google Scholar
- Robinson, M. (2010, October 2). What unitarians know (and Sam Harris doesn’t) [Review of the book The moral landscape, by S. Harris]. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved April 30, 2016, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703882404575520062380030080.