Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Male Sexual Jealousy to Deter Partner Infidelity

  • S. Ladwig
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3770-1

Synonyms

Definition

The jealousy males feel about female infidelity as an evolutionary reaction to internal female fertilization and paternity uncertainty.

Introduction

When infidelity occurs, males and females experience different biological and social costs. As such, they have developed different reactions toward infidelity. For males, one common reaction is sexual jealousy in order to deter partner infidelity.

The Costs of Infidelity

In species with internal female fertilization, partner infidelity has different costs for males and females. If a male’s mate has sexual contact with other males, the male has a lesser probability of impregnating his mate, and he has greater paternity uncertainty. If the rival male successfully impregnates his mate, the male will have lost the time, energy, nuptial gifts, the female’s parental effort, and the opportunity of mating with other females (Buss et al. 1992). Furthermore, in biparental species, where males...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation, and infidelity. London: Chapman and Hill. 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3(4), 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buss, D. M., Kirkpatrick, L., Shackelford, T., & Bennett, K. (1996). On the nature of sex differences in jealousy: Testing alternative hypotheses about origins. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  4. Buunk, B. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7(6), 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeSteno, D. A., & Salovey, P. (1996). Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the “fitness” of the model. Psychological Science, 7(6), 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nannini, D. K., & Meyers, L. S. (2000). Jealousy in sexual and emotional infidelity: An alternative to the evolutionary explanation. Journal of Sex Research, 37(2), 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2007). Adaptation to sperm competition in humans. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection (p. 136–179). Cambridge, MA: Biological Laboratories, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida State UniversityTallahasseUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kevin Beaver
    • 1
  1. 1.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA