Skip to main content

Human Deception

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 90 Accesses

Synonyms

Betrayal; Deceit; Duplicity; Lying; Treachery; Trickery

Definitions

Deception is notoriously difficult to define given that there are so many forms across human and nonhuman animals (Mitchell 1993). Here, we define deception as the intentional or unintentional misrepresentation of information. This misrepresentation can be conscious or unconscious and may serve a multitude of purposes including (but not limited to) survival (e.g., physical defense), resource acquisition (e.g., acquiring food or resources), or increased inclusive fitness (e.g., reproductive advantages).

Introduction

Deception is common in human interactions (Kashy and DePaulo 1996). It can be intentional such as in the case of lying, self-presentation, or withholding important information. Deception may also be unintentional or unconscious, such as in the case of self-deception (e.g., von Hippel and Trivers 2011). Deception may stem from good intentions or a desire not to harm, or it may come from a place of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Arvedlund, E. (2009). Too good to be true: The rise and fall of Bernie Madoff. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P., & Hare, R. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. L., & Simpson, S. S. (2009). White-collar crime: An opportunity perspective. New York, NH: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereczkei, T., Deak, A., Papp, P., Perlaki, G., & Orsi, G. (2013). Neural correlates of Machiavellian strategies in a social dilemma task. Brain and cognition, 82(1), 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Book, A., Methot, T., Gauthier, N., Hosker-Field, A., Forth, A., Quinsey, V., & Molnar, D. (2015). The mask of sanity revisited: Psychopathic traits and affective mimicry. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1(2), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (1989). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford Science Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caley, M. J., & Schluter, D. (2003). Predators favour mimicry in a tropical reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 667–672. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S., & Foster, J. D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 297–311. doi:10.1002/bdm.475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2011). Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme: Reliable returns from a trustworthy financial advisor. In D. Collins (Ed.), Business ethics (pp. 435–453). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeScioli, P., Christner, J., & Kurzban, R. (2011). The omission strategy. Psychological Science, 22, 442–446. doi:10.1177/0956797611400616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.N., & de Roos, M.S. (in press). Differential reproductive patterns among the Dark Triad. Evolutionary Psychological Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 102–120). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N. (2014). Predatory personalities as behavioral mimics and parasites mimicry–deception theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 445–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. R., & Bull, J. J. (1994). Short-sighted evolution and the virulence of pathogenic microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology, 2, 76–81. doi:10.1016/0966-842X(94)90538-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT) A Theory of Human Deception and Deception Detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–599. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00039595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. W. (1993). Animals as liars: The human face of nonhuman deception. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 59–89). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. W. (1996). The psychology of human deception. Social Research, 1996, 819–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C. J., & Zempolich, K. A. (1999). Emotion and aggression in the psychopathic personality. Aggression and violent behavior, 3(4), 303–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 681–693. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perri, F. S., & Brody, R. G. (2011). Birds of the same feather: The dangers of affinity fraud. Journal of Forensic Studies in Accounting & Business, 3(1), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfenning, D. W., Harcombe, W. R., & Pfenning, K. S. (2001). Frequency dependent Batesian Mimicry. Nature, 410, 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratkanis, A., & Shadel, D. (2005). Weapons of fraud: A source book for fraud fighters. Washington, DC: AARP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, R. M., & Gover, A. R. (2001). Personal fraud: The victims and the scams. Crime Prevention Studies, 12, 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotion adaptations and the structure of ancestral environment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424. doi:DOI10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-Z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2822435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. F., & Martinez, D. C. (1977). Socioeconomic achievement and the Machiavellian personality. Sociometry, 40, 325–336 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3033481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hipple, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 1–56. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10002657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. (2007). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Near, D. C., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 285–299. doi:10.1002/per.859.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, C. (2000). Parasite rex. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel N. Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

de Roos, M.S., Jones, D.N. (2016). Human Deception. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3305-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3305-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics