Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Human Deception

  • Melissa S. de Roos
  • Daniel N. JonesEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3305-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Deception is notoriously difficult to define given that there are so many forms across human and nonhuman animals (Mitchell 1993). Here, we define deception as the intentional or unintentional misrepresentation of information. This misrepresentation can be conscious or unconscious and may serve a multitude of purposes including (but not limited to) survival (e.g., physical defense), resource acquisition (e.g., acquiring food or resources), or increased inclusive fitness (e.g., reproductive advantages).

Introduction

Deception is common in human interactions (Kashy and DePaulo 1996). It can be intentional such as in the case of lying, self-presentation, or withholding important information. Deception may also be unintentional or unconscious, such as in the case of self-deception (e.g., von Hippel and Trivers 2011). Deception may stem from good intentions or a desire not to harm, or it may come from a place of...

Keywords

Nonhuman Animal Frequency Dependent Selection Cooperative Society Financial Community Dark Triad 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arvedlund, E. (2009). Too good to be true: The rise and fall of Bernie Madoff. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  4. Benson, M. L., & Simpson, S. S. (2009). White-collar crime: An opportunity perspective. New York, NH: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bereczkei, T., Deak, A., Papp, P., Perlaki, G., & Orsi, G. (2013). Neural correlates of Machiavellian strategies in a social dilemma task. Brain and cognition, 82(1), 108–116.Google Scholar
  6. Book, A., Methot, T., Gauthier, N., Hosker-Field, A., Forth, A., Quinsey, V., & Molnar, D. (2015). The mask of sanity revisited: Psychopathic traits and affective mimicry. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1(2), 91–102.Google Scholar
  7. Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (1989). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford Science Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Caley, M. J., & Schluter, D. (2003). Predators favour mimicry in a tropical reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 667–672. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S., & Foster, J. D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 297–311. doi: 10.1002/bdm.475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, D. (2011). Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme: Reliable returns from a trustworthy financial advisor. In D. Collins (Ed.), Business ethics (pp. 435–453). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. DeScioli, P., Christner, J., & Kurzban, R. (2011). The omission strategy. Psychological Science, 22, 442–446. doi: 10.1177/0956797611400616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, D.N., & de Roos, M.S. (in press). Differential reproductive patterns among the Dark Triad. Evolutionary Psychological Science.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 102–120). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, D. N. (2014). Predatory personalities as behavioral mimics and parasites mimicry–deception theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(4), 445–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kashy, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Levin, B. R., & Bull, J. J. (1994). Short-sighted evolution and the virulence of pathogenic microorganisms. Trends in Microbiology, 2, 76–81. doi: 10.1016/0966-842X(94)90538-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT) A Theory of Human Deception and Deception Detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392.Google Scholar
  19. Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–599. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00039595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell, R. W. (1993). Animals as liars: The human face of nonhuman deception. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 59–89). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell, R. W. (1996). The psychology of human deception. Social Research, 1996, 819–861.Google Scholar
  24. Patrick, C. J., & Zempolich, K. A. (1999). Emotion and aggression in the psychopathic personality. Aggression and violent behavior, 3(4), 303–338.Google Scholar
  25. Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 681–693. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perri, F. S., & Brody, R. G. (2011). Birds of the same feather: The dangers of affinity fraud. Journal of Forensic Studies in Accounting & Business, 3(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  28. Pfenning, D. W., Harcombe, W. R., & Pfenning, K. S. (2001). Frequency dependent Batesian Mimicry. Nature, 410, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pratkanis, A., & Shadel, D. (2005). Weapons of fraud: A source book for fraud fighters. Washington, DC: AARP.Google Scholar
  30. Titus, R. M., & Gover, A. R. (2001). Personal fraud: The victims and the scams. Crime Prevention Studies, 12, 133–152.Google Scholar
  31. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotion adaptations and the structure of ancestral environment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424. doi: DOI10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-Z.
  32. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2822435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner, C. F., & Martinez, D. C. (1977). Socioeconomic achievement and the Machiavellian personality. Sociometry, 40, 325–336 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3033481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. von Hipple, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 1–56. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10002657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wells, J. (2007). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Wilson, D. S., Near, D. C., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 285–299. doi: 10.1002/per.859.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zimmer, C. (2000). Parasite rex. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Texas, El PasoEl PasoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Christopher Watkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Abertay UniversityDundeeScotland