Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Science and Religion Compatibility

  • Christopher StarrattEmail author
  • Gerene Starratt
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3282-1

Definition

Science and religion are two fundamental ways that we have of understanding ourselves and the universe within which we exist. Both science and religion assert authority in the world. That is, both have – and utilize – “the power to influence or command thought, opinion, or behavior” (Merriam-Webster) in their respective areas of purview.

Science is the systematic study of the physical and natural world.

Religion is defined in a number of ways. For the purpose of this discussion, we will define religion as a shared system of beliefs, moral code, faith, and worship, with a focus on a god or similar supernatural forces. It is relevant to highlight the distinction between the practice of religion as the perspectives and actions of groups of people in regard to their faith (i.e., praxis) and the tenets of a particular faith (i.e., theology). While the practice of faith can be studied using quantitative and qualitative research methods, the tenetsof faith are difficult, if not...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barbour, I. G. (1997). Religion and science: Historical and contemporary issues. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, H., et al. (2006). Study of the therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: A multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer. American Heart Journal, 151(4), 934–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Consolmagno, G. (2007). God’s mechanics: How scientists and engineers make sense of religion. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker (p. xvii). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-31570-3.Google Scholar
  5. Galton, F. (1872, August 1). Statistical inquiries into the efficacy of prayer. The Fortnightly Review, LXVIII. Available at https://www.abelard.org/galton/galton.htm.
  6. Haisch, B. (2006). The god theory: Universes, zero-point fields, and what’s behind it all. York Beach: Red Wheel/Weiser Books. ISBN 1-57863-374-5.Google Scholar
  7. Ham, K. (1987). The lie: Evolution. New Leaf Publishing Group. ISBN 0890511586.Google Scholar
  8. Hodge, D. R. (2007). A systematic review of the empirical literature on intercessory prayer. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. MacDougall, D. (1907, April). Hypothesis concerning soul substance together with experimental evidence of the existence of such substance. American Medicine.Google Scholar
  10. Park, R. L. (2010). Superstition: Belief in the age of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN9780691145976.Google Scholar
  11. Yasari, P., Arthur, S., Smith, M. U., & Mancy, R. (2013). Relating science and religion: An ontology of taxonomies and development of a research tool for identifying individual views. Science and Education, 22, 2679–2707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Barry UniversityMiamiUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Valerie G. Starratt
    • 1
  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA