Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Peer Socialization

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2404-1


Introduction to Peer Socialization

The presence of peers is essential to human life as socializing is inherent to human nature (Hogan and Roberts 2004). Peers can be classified as individuals who surround us in our daily lives such as classmates, colleagues, friends, etc. Due to the fact that humans are constantly surrounded by peers during their lifetime, it is likely that peer interactions influence personality psychology. The core elements of personality are such: how we see ourselves (identity), how others see us (reputation), how we interact in social roles, and how identity, reputation, and interaction influence how we get along with others and achieve goals (Hogan and Roberts 2004). The latter two consider the impact of socializing on oneself.

Defining Peer Socialization

Peer socialization is the process in which peers can help one another develop skills that allow him or her to cooperate and act...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Buss, D. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73, 47–51.Google Scholar
  2. Choukas-bradley, S., Giletta, M., Cohen, G. L., & Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Peer influence, peer status, and prosocial behavior: An experimental investigation of peer socialization of adolescents’ intentions to volunteer. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2197–2210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Harris, J. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoerger, M., Chapman, B. P., Prigerson, H. G., Fagerlin, A., Mohile, S. G., Epstein, R. M., ... & Duberstein, P. R. (2014). Personality change pre-to post-loss in spousal caregivers of patients with terminal lung cancer. Social psychological and personality science, 5(6), 722–729.Google Scholar
  5. Hogan, R., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). A socioanalytic model of maturity. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McCrae, R. R. (1993). Moderated analyses of longitudinal personality stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Carey Fitzgerald
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South Carolina - BeaufortBlufftonUSA