Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Object Permanence

  • Chris FieldsEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2373-1



The apparent maintenance of object identity over time, especially during periods of non-observation.


Typically-developing human beings and at least some other animals tend to regard the objects around them, including other organisms, landscape features, and artifacts, as maintaining their identities – remaining the “same thing” – over time whether they are observed continuously or not. Objects are, in other words, regarded as “permanent” or “persistent” by default. Both experimental and theoretical practice in psychology largely adopt the “naïve realist” assumption that objects having the properties they are typically perceived to have are ontologically real, i.e., they in fact exist in an observation-independent way and in fact maintain their identities over time. Given this assumption, object permanence is the recognition or understanding of the continuous, identity-preserving existence of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis for social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693–716.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Baillargeon, R. (2008). Innate ideas revisited: For a principle of persistence in infants’ physical reasoning. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 3, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldassarre, G., & Mirolli, M. (Eds.). (2013). Intrinsically motivated learning in natural and artificial systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, G., Alijabar, P., Zebari, S., Tusor, N., Arichi, T., Merchant, N., Robinson, E. C., Ogundipe, E., Ruekert, D., Edwards, A. D., & Counsell, S. J. (2014). Rich-club organization of the newborn human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111, 7456–7461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjorklund, D. F., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). The origins of human nature: Evolutionary Developmental Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cangelosi, A., & Schlesinger, M. (2015). Developmental robotics: From babies to robots. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, S. B. (2008). Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell, 134, 25–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. R., & Ranganath, C. (2007). The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 123–152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317, 1344–1347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Düntsch, I., & Gediga, G. (2000). Rough set data analysis. Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, 43, 281–301.Google Scholar
  12. Fama, R., Pitel, A.-L., & Sullivan, E. V. (2012). Anterograde episodic memory in Korsakoff syndrome. Neuropsychological Review, 22, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fields, C. (2011). Trajectory recognition as the basis for object individuation: A functional model of object file instantiation and object-token encoding. Frontiers in Psychology: Perception Science, 2, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fields, C. (2012). The very same thing: Extending the object token concept to incorporate causal constraints on individual identity. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 234–247.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fields, C., & Glazebrook, J. F. (2017). Disrupted development and imbalanced function in the global neuronal workspace: A positive-feedback mechanism for the emergence of autism in early infancy. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 11, 1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Flombaum, J. I., Scholl, B. J., & Santos, L. R. (2008). Spatiotemporal priority as a fundamental principle of object persistence. In B. Hood & L. Santos (Eds.), The origins of object knowledge (pp. 135–164). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gao, W., Alcauter, S., Smith, J. K., Gilmore, J. H., & Lin, W. (2015). Development of human brain cortical network architecture during infancy. Brain Structure & Function, 220, 1173–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geschwind, D. H., & Flint, J. (2015). Genetics and genomics of psychiatric disease. Science, 349, 1489–1494.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomot, M., & Wicker, B. (2012). A challenging, unpredictable world for people with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 240–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Güntürkün, O., & Bugnyar, T. (2016). Cognition without cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 291–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman, D. D., Singh, M., & Prakash, C. (2015). The interface theory of perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1480–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaakkola, K. (2014). Do animals understand invisible displacement? A critical review. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 225–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, C. M., Sullivan, J., Buck, C. L., Trexel, J., & Scarpuzzi, M. (2015). Visible and invisible displacement with dynamic visual occlusion in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp). Animal Cognition, 18, 179–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Karg, K., Schmelz, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2014). All great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Pongo abelii) and two-and-a-half-year-old children discriminate appearance from reality. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 431–439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein, S. B. (2014). Sameness and the self: Philosophical and psychological considerations. Frontiers in Psychology: Perception Science, 5, 29.Google Scholar
  26. Mathews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Time perception: The bad news and the good. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 5, 429–446.Google Scholar
  27. Merchant, H., Harrington, D. L., & Meck, W. H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 36, 313–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Metzinger, T. (2011). The no-self alternative. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The oxford handbook of the self (pp. 287–305). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Müller, G. B. (2007). Evo-devo: Extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 943–949.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rochat, P. (2012). Primordial sense of embodied self-unity. In V. Slaughter & C. A. Brownell (Eds.), Early development of body representations (pp. 3–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Scholl, B. J. (2007). Object persistence in philosophy and psychology. Mind & Language, 22, 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thornton, A., & Lukas, D. (2012). Individual variation in cognitive performance: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 367, 2773–2783.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiseman, H. (2015). Quantum physics: Death by experiment for local realism. Nature, 526, 649–650.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zentall, J. R., & Pattison, K. F. (2016). Now you see it, now you don't: Object permanence in dogs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caunes MinervoisFrance

Section editors and affiliations

  • Carey Fitzgerald
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South Carolina - BeaufortBlufftonUSA