References
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451.
Jason, G. (2011). Does virtue epistemology provide a better account of the ad hominem argument? A reply to Christopher Johnson. Philosophy, 86(1), 95–119.
Johnson, C. (2009). Reconsidering the ad hominem. Philosophy, 84(2), 251–266.
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C., & Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50(5), 1471–1550.
Putman, D. (2010). Discussion: Equivocating the ad hominem. Philosophy, 85(334), 551–556.
Van Eemeren, F., Meuffels, B., & Verburg, M. (2000). The (un)reasonableness of ad hominem fallacies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19(4), 416–435.
Yap, A. (2013). Ad hominem fallacies, Bias, and testimony. Argumentation, 27(2), 97–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tamez, A. (2019). Ad Hominem. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2192-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2192-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences