Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Female Infidelity

  • Christina BentancourtEmail author
  • Joseph A. Camilleri
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2052-1

Synonyms

Definition

Female who is intimate with someone other than her partner.

Human mating is socially monogamous, where males and females create long-term pair bonds that share space, resources, and responsibilities for raising offspring. Not all such relationships are sexually monogamous, however, because significant proportions of males and females engage in extra-pair copulations. Extra-pair copulations are observed across various fish, bird, mammal, and insect species (Birkhead 2000). In humans, data from the most recent General Social Survey showed that 20% of men and 13% of women report having sex with someone who is not their partner (Wang 2018). Prevalence rates vary across location, sampling, and measurement methods, with some studies reporting female infidelity rates up to 25% (Whisman and Snyder 2007).

Theoretical explanations for the relatively high prevalence rates of female infidelity address its possible functions. Unlike men, women cannot...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Birkhead, T. (2000). Promiscuity: An evolutionary history of sperm competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Camilleri, J. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2009). Testing the cuckoldry risk hypothesis of partner sexual coercion in community and forensic samples. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2), 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camilleri, J. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2012). Sexual conflict and partner rape. In A. T. Goetz & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Oxford handbook of sexual conflict in humans (pp. 257–268). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Sexual coercion and forced in-pair copulation as sperm competition tactics in humans. Human Nature, 17(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mulder, M. B., & Rauch, K. L. (2009). Sexual conflict in humans: Variations and solutions. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18(5), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stieglitz, J., Guerven, M., Kaplan, H., & Winking, J. (2012). Infidelity, jealousy, and wife abuse among Tsimane forager-farmers: Testing evolutionary hypotheses of marital conflict. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(5), 438–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang, W. (2018). Who cheats more? The demographics of infidelity in America. Retrieved 26 July 2018, from https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america.
  8. Whisman, M. A., & Snyder, D. K. (2007). Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: Differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 289–322). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Westfield State UniversityWestfieldUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Joseph A Camilleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Westfield State UniversityWestfieldUSA