Skip to main content

Dating

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 41 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhart, G. C., Fitzpatrick, J., & Williamson, J. (2014). Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in Human Behaviour, 33, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botnen, E. O., Bendixen, M., Grøntvedt, T. V., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 23–56). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., Craig, W., Goldberg, A., & Pepler, D. (1999). Conceptions of cross-sex friendships and romantic relationships in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J. A., Furman, W., & Konarski, R. (2000). The role of peers in the emergence of heterosexual romantic relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71, 1395–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., Craig, W., Goldberg, A., & Pepler, D. (2004). Mixed-gender groups, dating and romantic relationships in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14, 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch, D., Liamputtong, P., & Pitts, M. (2012). What are the real and perceived risks and dangers of online dating? Perspectives from online daters. Health, Risk, & Society, 14, 697–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, M., Miller, D., Wehle, S. M. J., & Hernandez, E. (2016). Why do people lie online? “Because everyone lies on the internet.” Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face to face interaction: Research methods and theory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham, T. M., Malloy, T., & Hodges, E. D. (1993). Halitosis: Knowing when “bad breath” signals systemic disease. Geriatrics, 48, 55–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2011). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W. (2002). The emerging field of adolescent romantic relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., & Shomaker, L. B. (2008). Patterns of interaction in adolescent romantic relationships: Distinct features and links to other close relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 771–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K. (1990). Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 14, 209–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. E., & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. The Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Kruse, S. A. (2012). Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation. Computers in Human Behaviour, 20, 642–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, T., Overbeek, G., de Greef, M., Scholte, R. H. J., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2010). The importance of relationships with parents and best friends for adolescents’ romantic relationship quality: Differences between indigenous and ethnic Dutch adolescents. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 34, 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, L., De Backer, C. J. S., Fisher, M., & Walrave, M. (2018). Are sex differences in mating strategies overrated? Sociosexual orientation as a dominant predictor in online dating strategies. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern-Meekin, S., & Tach, L. (2013). Discordance in couples’ reporting of courtship stages: Implications for measurement and marital quality. Social Science Research, 42, 1143–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2005). What makes you click: An empirical analysis of online dating. Retrieved from https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Workshops-Seminars/Industrial-Organization/hortacsu-050908.pdf

  • Hobbs, M., Owen, S., & Gerber, L. (2017). Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology, 53, 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college student: An evolutionary perspective. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 612–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. M. (2002). Courtship communication and perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, L. (2004). Perception of individualism and collectivism in Dutch society: A developmental approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 336–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L. D., Cheever, N. A., Cummings, C., & Felt, J. (2008). The impact of emotionality and self-disclosure on online dating versus traditional dating. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24, 2124–2157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowatt, W. C., Cunningham, M. R., & Druen, P. B. (1998). Deception to get a date. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 24(11), 1228–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2019). Deception in online dating: Significance and implications for the first offline date. New Media & Society, 21, 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. W., Eder, D., & Evans, C. (1992). The development of feeling norms underlying romantic love among adolescent females. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Whitton, S. W. (2010). Commitment: Functions, formation, and the securing of romantic attachment. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. (1977). The family, sex, and marriage in England. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37, 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vennum, A., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Assessing decision making in young adult romantic relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 739–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C. M., Brown, B. B., Altman, I., & Staples, B. (1992). Close relationships in their physical and social contexts: A transactional perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 411–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wlodarski, R., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). What’s in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mate desirability. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan MacKinnon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

MacKinnon, M. (2020). Dating. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_203-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_203-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics