Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Infant Survival

  • Tommie ForslundEmail author
  • Pehr Granqvist
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1965-1

Synonyms

Definition

Human infants are very vulnerable and dependent on their caregivers for survival into reproductive age. The attachment system, as defined by John Bowlby, is a behavioral control system with a set goal of maintaining proximity to caregivers, which has been retained through evolution as it increased the chances of survival against predators and other natural dangers (i.e., the functional consequence). Bowlby also argued that caregivers have a complementary caregiving system making them responsive to children’s attachment behaviors. Thus, although children (the weaker part) attach to their caregiver(s) (the stronger part), and not the other way around, children’s forming of attachment is a collaborative effort. Mary Ainsworth subsequently discovered three organized patterns of attachment (i.e., secure, insecure-avoidant, and insecure-ambivalent/resistant), which have all been argued to be evolutionarily adaptive in that they enable...

Keywords

Attachment Security Avoidant Attachment Human Child Attachment Behavior Attachment System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bowlby, J. (1944). Fourty-four Juvenile Thieves: their characters and home life (I & II). International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 25, 154–178, 107–127.Google Scholar
  3. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss (Entire work). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowlby, J. (1997). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1, attachment. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  6. Harlow, H. F., & Zimmerman, R. R. (1959). Affectional response in the infant monke. Science, 130(3373), 421–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Main, M. (1981). Avoidance in the service of attachment: a working paper. In K. Ingelmann, G. Barlow, M. Main, & L. Petrinovich (Eds.), Behavioral development: the bielefeld interdisciplinary project (pp. 651–693). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1992). Disorganized/disoriented infant behavior in the strange situation, lapses in the monitoring of reasoning and discourse during the parent’s adult attachment interview, and dissociative states. In M. Ammaniti & D. Stern (Eds.), Attachment and psychoanalysis (pp. 86–140). Rome: Gius, Laterza & Figli.Google Scholar
  9. Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of an insecure-disorganized/disoriented attachment pattern: procedures, findings, and implications for the classification of behavior. In T. B. Brazelton & M. Yogman (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 95–124). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  10. Robertson, J., & Bowlby, J. (1952). Responses of young children to separation from their mothers. In J. Bowlby (Ed.), Attachment and loss (1997): Vol. 1, attachment. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  11. Simpson, J.A., & Belsky, J. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework (131–157). In J. Cassidy, & P. R Shaver (eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 173–191). The Guilford Press: New York, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Section editors and affiliations

  • Gary L Brase
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA