Individual differences refer to the many ways in which people differ in terms of traits or characteristics. In the vernacular of behavioral and molecular genetics, individual differences are known as phenotypic variance.
The majority of theoretical and empirical literature in evolutionary psychology tends to focus on the numerous ways in which humans are similar. For example, researchers have illuminated how aspects of the human condition such as sexual attraction, mating strategies, disgust, fear, and even political strategy transcend cultural boundaries. These widespread similarities are a product of our species’ shared evolutionary history and so it is somewhat unsurprising, though certainly fascinating, that members of species share so many similar psychological characteristics. Nonetheless, humans across the globe are certainly not identical; indeed, our species is rich...
- Beaver, K. M. (2009). Biosocial criminology: A primer. Dubuque: Kendhall/Hunt Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Penke, L. (2009). Bridging the gap between modern evolutionary psychology and the study of individual differences. In D. M. Buss & P. H. Hawley (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderheiser, J. (2013). Behavioral genetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Segal, N. (2000). Entwined lives. Penguin, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Wright, J. P., Barnes, J. C., Boutwell, B. B., Schwartz, J. A., Connolly, E. J., Nedelec, J. L., & Beaver, K. M. (2015). Mathematical proof is not minutiae and irreducible complexity is not a theory: A final response to Burt and Simons and a call to criminologists. Criminology, 53, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar